|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:11 PM Original message |
Do you see the Corruption Issue as a GOP mess or as Bipartisan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itzamirakul
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is very good. Why don't you email it to the NYT or some other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Who enables this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. "Purchase Of Favors"? It's Freaking Extortion, Money Laundering And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I'll put you into the GOP scandal column |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. Geeze louise.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. If you don;t think it's gotten geometrically worse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's bi-partisan and it won't end until we punish those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newswolf56
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well said. But the problem is not limited to Washington D.C.: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Also well said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. 90% GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow2u3
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. We must get rid of private (corporate) money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. had this discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yeah, never mind how the corruption got exposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. It's systemic ethics, not just crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Never gets attempted??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 09:29 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Hilarycare was a sop to corporate insurers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. the republicans don't have a Feingold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. I agree there are worthy exceptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'm not naive enough to think that we don't have a few Democrats who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
15. corruption is apolitical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
checks-n-balances
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. My thoughts exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 07:24 AM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Same character defects make it likely for one to pretend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. Party corruption is a BIPARTISAN ISSUE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 07:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I think so too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. This K-Street scandal (Duke Cunningham) is most all Republican... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroubleMan
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. This is one of the reasons the USA has a really low voter turnout. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. I was disappointed to see Byron Dorgan (D-ND) involved with Abramoff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. How is that corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. He should have recused himself or rejected the donations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam_Lowry
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
21. Mostly republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. A point of clarification -- Corrupt individuals vs. Corrupt system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shugah
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
31. mostly GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
32. Opportunistic. Can be partisan, currently is, RepubliCON. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
33. Congressman Murtha is part of the military-industrial cancer on America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
34. 90% GOP, 75% Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trish1168
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
37. Harry Reid took money from Abramoff....its bipartisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Whiskey Priest
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
38. Disappointed because it is bi-partisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarahlee
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. Well said; Agree it is bipartisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
40. Without 100% Public Financeing of Campaigns it will never end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfgrbac
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
42. We can't depend on Democrats to restore good government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
43. Right now, it's like the difference between venal and mortal sin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC