|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:10 PM Original message |
Wesley Clark supports a flag-burning amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Eh. I'm not using my rights anyway. Thanks Wes. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:12 PM Original message |
No. Sacred cows must be flammable...they taste better that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. This is one of the very few points that I disagree with Clark on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. I know. He's always said that and it sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. At least he's honest about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Here's a mopre forceful statement by him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrhopeforwes (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. it means that Wes knows it'll alienate some people, but that's his honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
38. It's not just that he'd support it if people want it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I think his motivation is more political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrhopeforwes (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. well said. and of course his motivation is political...he's a realist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. No, it's personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. "Congress shall make NO law abridging the freedom of speech.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. See, there is nuance in everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Deservedly so, if he's against free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. He said this in 2004. I'm just counterpointing his treatment with Hillary' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Well, you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. One does wonder. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. you believe Clark is far to the right of Hillary? interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. How to deal with the Iraqi War? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. we are STILL in afghanistan, you always use afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I meant Afghanistan in the 1990s not after 9/11. Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Yeah, but Clark doesn't run right 5 times out of 10. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. That's not what I've seen, on either side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. He never equivocated on Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. FINALLY... I found a FULL reprint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Torpedoing the First Amendment, I see. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Chipping away at the First Amendment until it's gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. Does He Know About Precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. You raise a valid point, though. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. Most of the American public does in polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. The first amendment is hardly a "minor issue". Except to politicians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
41. Most of the American public does not support the amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrhopeforwes (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
19. hello!!! Bigger picture, people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Actually, that wasn't his last word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrhopeforwes (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
48. wow, you "fervently" hope Clark never becomes president... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. The only thing I disagree with him on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeveneightyWhoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. Another reason to love Wes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. Most politicians who want to be president will support the amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Not Hilary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. Kerrry and Edwards didn't & don't support the Constitional amdmt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
31. Boy this is becoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. What's becoming idol worship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 06:01 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. What proven leaders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. So did Kuchinich, Dean & the others. Not Holly Joe though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
39. Everybody's wrong sometimes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hyernel (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
40. It's meaningless puffery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 04:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Amending the Constitution is not "meaningless puffery" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran1212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
45. He's a ******** General! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemCam (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
47. The only thing I don't give a s**t about, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
49. This isn't a finger to the wind position of his, it is deeply felt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jun 16th 2024, 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC