|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
MyUncle
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 02:39 PM Original message |
Protest Tookie's death YES, celebrate his life - NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree with you on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. I echo OhioBlues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. If you knew what Becnel has done and, like her, had seen the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyUncle
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Sorry, but I don't agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. As I said, if you knew what BECNEL had seen, you might change your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyUncle
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 05:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Tookie co founded the Crips. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You really haven't researched this at all have you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ariana Celeste
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Thanks for the links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Honestly, it's very interesting stuff if you really delve into it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
43. You're really invested in this "Tookie" guy, aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #8 |
59. The Nazi Party existed before Hitler as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. LOL . . . are you familiar with Godwin's Law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:54 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. ah the Nazis may have collapsed due at least as much to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. I notice you didn't address Godwin's Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I did address the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. What I said was that without Hitler, the party did not grow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. By 1942 the Nazis ran Germany |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Then you don't know too much history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Dec-17-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I am not claiming he was totally unimportant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
6th Borough
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
37. I could be mistaken, but I believe he led the West Side Crips... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 07:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Well, you might have that impression if your only source of info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monobrau
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. "tens of thousands" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. No, a significant drop would result if people currently in gangs left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monobrau
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Research? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. But...but...but...he kept Mike Farrell from putting on colors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:27 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Geee, that was a great contribution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Some of us possess wit and others are burdened with misplaced priorities.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:45 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Preposterous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:52 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. You only engage in discussions with those who agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:58 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. No, I engage with those who present arguments with back-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:14 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. LOL . . . a peer reviewed study? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:15 AM Response to Reply #34 |
60. Statistical studies are peer reviewed all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:31 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Please provide an parallel example of a directly comparable situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. A directly comparable situation would be the effectiveness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Not a valid comparison. It doesn't take into account other factors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. Some responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Then you haven't actually read the links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Dec-17-05 08:35 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. You have provided two links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
79. Deleted message |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. Gee, I notice that, as you have throughout this thread, you provide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Tookie compared to Rosa Parks? Beyond quesy. Full out retch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Actually, he wasn't compared to Parks, the size of his funeral was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I can't agree more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Only if you don't read what was said, since no such comparison was made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Then they should've compared it to the funeral of another asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You didn't write the article, but you misread it, misrepresented what it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Maybe you are right. Think Bill Clinton will show up for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. First you say that they compared Williams to Parks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Forget Intellectual honesty, lets just be plain ol' honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Really? I think you understimate how well respected he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Do you think he was well-respected as Rosa Parks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. LOL . . . there you go twisting words again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I just want to know if you believe you can compare the 2 or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Sure there's a comparison, but not in the way you think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
78. Where/Are you in love with Tookie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. Ah, the refuge of someone with no argument is to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:10 AM Response to Reply #22 |
49. I've read all of your posts in this thread, and some of the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:34 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. I don't talk down to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:52 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I know what it means, here's a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I think maybe the reason it sounds like I was yelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. The older men were kept all info to themselves, and the young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:25 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. I know they're all not ogres. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
46. Jesse Jackson shows up anywhere there is a news camera. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:15 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. You got that right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
45. Intellectual dishonesty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. It never ceases to amaze me how often people twist the English language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
61. Actually since you are lecturing everyone else on words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #61 |
77. LOL . . . the author? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Incidently I actually looked at an online dictionary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Deleted message |
Cleetus
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
23. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:32 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Yet another one who didn't read what the article or statement actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
28. All life is worthwhile and he spent most of his in jail doing good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Well, in all fairness, I wouldn't say "most" of his life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyUncle
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:30 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. ET, your points are made well, you do know your "shit" but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:22 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. So what you're saying is that, in your opinion, a persons good deeds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 07:59 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Another tidbit for thought . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
39. "Should not be tolerated"?? While I agree that Tookie should not.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:02 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Thank you for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:22 AM Response to Reply #39 |
51. I don't know about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:32 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Hmmm. Did you actually research this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:37 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:39 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Yes, but my question was more pertaining to Williams, not Blair and Shrub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:40 AM Response to Reply #56 |
66. I apologise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:47 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Understood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
52. Nothing to move on to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyUncle
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #52 |
73. I agree with you NaturalHigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. No, but it will be an EVENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Since when are funerals about the death penalty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia
![]() |
Sat Dec-17-05 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
90. Funerals are usually about celebrating someone's life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC