|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Bleacher Creature
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:51 PM Original message |
How would having paper receipts w/voting machines help? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. A paper receipt means nothing. What is needed is a paper trail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Paper Ballots NOW! Hand Counts NOW!! IMPEACHMENT NOW!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Salviati
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. what people are really asking for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. What this poster said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. People have to either drop their ballot into a box before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I doubt you could do a selective 10%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The ballots can still be secret - I don't have to show anyone what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Think about what you just said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Not count 10% of each precinct - count 10% of all the precints in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. That process would work, except, if you found a material difference, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Yes, exactly - paper count overrides the electronic, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. No. No. No. And Yes. Yes. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. It isn't a paper receipt that you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. We don't need recipts. We need Voter Verified Paper Ballots that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. which of the 3 tally sheets will be printed, 3% win for the Reich wing..?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. don't print 'tally sheets' - print voter verified paper ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. the tallies are only altered to create a 3% win.. the machines will print |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 06:05 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. the tallies can and have been adjusted to create > 3% wins - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-05 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. There would have to be two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. there are 3 internal tally sheets inside the Diebold, there are 2 extra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
19. Without audits, it would mean jack squat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
20. If you are voting on a Diebold-style machine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC