|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:56 PM Original message |
Did you all catch what Karen Kwiatkowski said about this NSA spying issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. wow, no I didn't. Thanks for posting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. My fear is that we won't get an impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I think that's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ptolle
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. not just that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trevelyan
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 01:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
92. Please sign Rep. Conyers' Letter to Begin Impeachment Investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. We might get a revolution instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. I think one is starting to take shape already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elwood P Dowd
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. Correction - She's a retired lieutenant colonel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elwood P Dowd
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You're welcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. Someone on the Thom Hartmann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Wasn't the numbers more in the 10k area? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
67. Bush as a person is rather dim, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. We just don't get it I guess.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. What is it about lurking enemy Quakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. "American citizens were objectified as means to an end" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. I never thought I'd do this - but I'm going out tonight to buy a gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Isn't hunting season |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I think it's just beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. Thank you so much for posting..K&R....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. WilliamPitt, as always you are right on target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
18. Will, you realize that this whole thing is the Federalist Society's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. You Were Reading my Mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
19. Oh Brother... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. You have a problem with her quoting the Declaration of Independence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Hee hee hee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Whatever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. It's a Little Hard to *Re-frame* That Which Has Been Already Framed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #49 |
82. LOL - "the current fad of re-framing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. It's the FOUNDATION OF our CONSTITUTION...and our separation from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
53. social agreements are for morons, inherent rights are more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
63. right you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 08:47 AM Response to Reply #53 |
72. If an opinion is shared by a majority, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
69. No! "Endowed by their Creator" is another way of saying these rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:54 PM Response to Reply #69 |
86. I Guess... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StoryTeller
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. She's referring to the Declaration of Independence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Sounds like you're one of those single-issue posters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. This assumes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. And, Orwell, dear (nice handle, that), you'll notice that Thomas Jefferson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. A notable difference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
54. sorry but you fail to understand the crux of the Founders' argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:33 AM Response to Reply #54 |
65. classical philosophy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
85. Christian Context? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. back off from your literalism and it'll be easier to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Thanks for Instructing Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusmcj
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. rights weren't conferred, they were recognized as inviolable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
24. Impeachment NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. Many thanks, Will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Not NOW. Next December. After a Dem sweep of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:47 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Pelosi '07, Boxer/Conyers '08! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emald
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #38 |
78. Not now????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #78 |
81. Gotta hand it to emald - he's got a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Agitating for Impeachment is Fine, Talking is Fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
26. out Nixoned-Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. It's going to be a difficult, and possibly long, hard battle to recover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
35. I said the same exact words to my husband "We (the US & its citizens) are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
36. we must immediately begin impeachment proceedings against this particular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. Sometimes I think impeachment isn't enough. Not nearly. JAILTIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PinkyisBlue
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:54 AM Response to Reply #37 |
66. Impeachment isn't enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reichstag911
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #66 |
80. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowOne
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
39. ** knows he's above the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
40. thanks for the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
41. K & R. She's retired, so she can speak. Let's hope for many more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. But can awareness be heightened before Alito is confirmed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
45. Boy, the only thing that would be better is finding out that the White |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
46. DC anti-constitutionalist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
50. Paragraph that certainly got my attention: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
52. That's beautiful, man.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
55. Thank God for people like this who tell it like it really is!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileMaker
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
56. She has a radio show now and would make a good President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
57. Completely taken over! We must stand up and fight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. "Radical militant librarians?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 11:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. No you are absolutely wrong on this. They must follow the law! They |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:01 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Unfortunately we have the example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:04 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. 2000 election is not precedence for this illegal shit. Can't compare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #61 |
79. seems to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
62. Fascism.... seems the appropriate term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
64. Karen is my heroine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
68. "because he has clearly earned impeachment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
70. "refuse to subsidize Washington in every way" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
71. Why? Why is this happening? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 08:53 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. They've got a large support network |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emald
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
74. if there is no impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPZenger
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
75. Must be Illegitimate, or Would Have Gone to Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. or they're simply testing the boundaries of executive power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
76. Kwiatowski needs to run for office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wind Dancer
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
83. She speaks the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caoimhe
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
84. Thanks for this! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
89. ok, wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC