|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:29 PM Original message |
Demanding Impeachment: -- We MUST get past "Can't happen, so don't try" !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rocknrule
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, let's quit repeating the self - defeating talk. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. It'll happen when GOP Congressmen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
36. Spot on -- Punishing perpetrators is a critical component of justice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. True, Impeachments not enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
44. The Nixon gang served |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firefox
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am for removing WarCriminal and every member of Congress that is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
37. Yep -- Get on Impeachment or face a Primary Opponent who WILL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
58. The Green Party Made Impeachment a Platform Plank in 7/03! nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:28 AM Response to Reply #58 |
74. A primary opponent is different sort of threat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. wish I could be keener about third party polictics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. The future is Green if we implement IRV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. IRV is essential, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Depends on the voting history for the race. There's another approach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. kick ('em in the balls) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Demand the "impossible"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
39. Call into account = Face primary opponent that demands Impeachment NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. Given that bu$h is so out of touch, this is a good way to touch him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Defeatism is the only posture some on DU know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
40. Need to challenge this terrible and counterproductive habit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. ok, tell me what vote in the House we have won in recent memory?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. First, No one can KNOW the future, Second, So What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Some of us would rather win the House and Senate in 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. jeezus, so let them vote for alito, the patriot act, and everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Please don't put words in my mouth. Its disingenuous of you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cults4Bush
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Well there are some Dems who are saying it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I think it's admirable for the Democrats to win both houses of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Just a sec... you believe it is more important to put Dem butts in seats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I believe one leads to the other. And it is the only way it would... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. Please clarify. Are you saying our elected officials should sit on their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. The ONLY way we can do the Impeachment thing is to put MORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. The part that kinda gets stuck in my throat is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 06:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Respectfully, its time to face reality. Impeachment is not a judicial.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Let me try this from a different angle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. If you notice, we haven't done too good of a job at standing for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. You're making sense...and you like Pavement...ah mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. No, that isn't my primary objective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
46. If you haven't noticed, the reason why we got our asses kicked is because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:37 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Hear, hear! -- It is the politically SMART thing, but even if it weren't, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:24 AM Response to Reply #28 |
50. Demanding Impeachment is not just right, it is POLITICALLY SMART! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
49. No risk they perceive compares to what our armed services face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. Impeachment is NOT impossible and you are right that we must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
52. Every time we challenge the rationalizations, we are making a dent n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. Agreed. - K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
15. Demand RESIGNATION. We don't have time for impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I think this might be the route if Commander Bunnypants is scared enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
53. Removing from power, however accomplished, is just the first step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftupnorth
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
17. even if we lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
54. And, like any investigation, who knows what an Impeachment Inquiry ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. Impeachment is not possible unless we control the Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightOwwl
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Then the Dems need to be drumming it into their heads every day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
55. Proclamations like this are precisely what we need to nip in the bud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. Totally agreed. Silence is not our friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #19 |
56. FAX too -- Greet them on Jan 3rd with a Mountain of FAXes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
23. My objection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
60. There is no legalistic test for high crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 AM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
77. and the repubs lost ground for pushing impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
32. Demanding impeachment ON SOLID GROUNDS is good for the Democratic Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:24 AM Response to Reply #32 |
61. And, we have VERY Solid grounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. three cheers for you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:32 AM Response to Reply #33 |
62. It's great to hear from people who "get it" ! -- n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
38. Am so past it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:33 AM Response to Reply #38 |
63. And working on the people around you I hope? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
42. Put a pair of balls in every Congressperson's Christmas stocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:34 AM Response to Reply #42 |
64. Love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
45. I'm with ya on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:41 AM Response to Reply #45 |
65. Once the ball starts rolling, things can move fast... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tlsmith1963
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
48. We Have No Choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:45 AM Response to Reply #48 |
67. Constitution be damned. A ticking bomb could be out there! Anything goes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
57. Our mantra ; Democrats in '06, Impeach in '07. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
68. Get on the Impeachment bus OR face a Primary Opponent who will !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
59. Bush Step Down and Take Your Program With You! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:20 AM Response to Reply #59 |
73. Saturday, after the State of the Union Address (Jan 28th?) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. SOTU hasn't been scheduled yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
66. There really is no hope if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 AM Response to Reply #66 |
71. We hold these truths to be self-evident... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kick_them_hard
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
70. I bet they spied on the Kerry campaign too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:12 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. And meetups -- We the People, talking to each other, are a REAL threat ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuneInJax
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
79. Agreed. I wrote to my reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC