|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
kath
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:34 PM Original message |
killer paragraph from judge's decision in Dover intelligent design case: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oooooh, I like the sound of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shenmue
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Terrific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. "The breathtaking inanity of the board's decision." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 01:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Hear hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. you know how he got this job, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Here's some info about the judge from a comment on William Dembski's blog: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. he didn't rule against the wishes of his allies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. I heard the Discovery Institute guy screeching like a scalded cat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. They should get rid of the bastard who appointed him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Discovery Institute? Discovery Institute? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. And I say, I say again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnarchoFreeThinker
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. that's some good shit. thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. Here are some blogs commenting on the decision: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. yeah Discovery got gobsmacked here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. love your tagline and avatar, northzax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Oh, so the lying was about this being a religious issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:25 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. yep, see my post below. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. They try to make it about "presenting alternatives" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
10. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
12. Wow! I don't care who appointed him. I like this judge!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
17. It is an opinion that other Judges can utilitze as the matter comes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 02:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. It's a very good thing. The opinion is very thorough, detailed and wide- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
20. What lies were the school board members telling under oath? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:14 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. One of the ringleaders who began the whole ID thing said in deposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:29 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Wow. This Christian leftie is thinkin' that things will get quite toasty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GaYellowDawg
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:34 AM Response to Original message |
26. I've read the opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:44 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. It really is great, isn't it? That opinion is blistering!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-22-05 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
27. Here's a good summary of the background of the case, both pre-trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 03:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC