oregonindy
(790 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:02 PM
Original message |
| so any legs to the story bill clinton also had warrantless wiretaps? |
|
saw it on sludge and now a few riechwing sites. Starting to research it but if theres already info on it can you point it to me?
thanks
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you rob a 7-11 it does not cease to be a crime because someone else robbed the same store a couple of years ago.
|
billybob537
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Among the righties, yes. Apparently Clinton is the gold standard of |
|
presidents.
There's a story about a warrantless search of Aldrich Ames's house.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Bet your ass that's the first thing the right will say. Right or wrong. |
|
He didn't go on national television and declare it his right and vow to keep on doing it.
|
tjwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Whipping out the Clenis as a last resort. |
|
Damn liberal media :eyes:
|
Tennessee Gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. No legs! Read this ..... |
|
Fact Check: Clinton/Carter Executive Orders Did Not Authorize Warrantless Searches of Americans http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/20/drudge-fact-check/
|
oregonindy
(790 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 13. AWESOME!!! Exactly what I was looking for! Get this up and flowing!!!! |
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
was not an american citizen?
|
SeattleRob
(893 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Think Progress Debunks the BS |
GrumpyGreg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Coastie for Truth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If true - wouldn't Judge Starr and/or Judge Freh or Senator Lindsey Graham found it?
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. DU debunked it yesterday on a thread here in GD (link) |
Bridget Burke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Details are provided in several previous posts.
|
jbonkowski
(243 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. It had to do with Aldrich Ames |
|
So start there. It was something about the FISA law only applying to eavesdropping, not searching through papers and such. Clinton signed a directive after ordering the search that FISA applies to house searches as well as wiretapping overseas.
All this is not that interesting, though. The stuff with Clinton all involved foreigners, NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS. Clinton never ordered spying on American citizens, overseas or not, without a warrant (as far as anyone seems to know).
Don't let people trotting out Carter and Clinton executive orders confuse you. None of that stuff applies to American citizens, only foreigners and stuff between foreigners. If Bush ordered listening on citizens without warrants, those executive orders do not apply.
jim
|
Rainbow gatherer
(91 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. I started researching this back in 1999. |
|
Use certain words in e-mails and phone conversations and even then the warning was that you would be monitored.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. no, no and no. He used FISA, that's what they meant. |
|
There is not one instance where Clinton didn't return to the court to get a warrant.
Once again the freepers are being used by being force-fed half truths by their cynical rulers.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 18. Somebody got lost on the internets? |
|
Cite any reliable source that indicates any prosecution, conviction, or attack detection stemming from such wiretaps of "United States persons" please.
|
tkmorris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Using that logic it would be acceptable to put every single Middle Eastern person in the US into a detention camp until they die. It might prevent a terrorist attack so it's ok.
If you don't like civil rights may I suggest that you move to a country where you don't have any? This is my country and I WILL defend her against the likes of you.
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. google HR1555 Section 309 |
Hyernel
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. Clinton didn't use warrantless wiretaps... |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 05:18 PM by Hyernel
Clinton was able to protect Americans WITHOUT breaking the law and violating the Constitution.
Clinton was also able to win a war, overthrowing a vicious dictator, without getting any U.S. Troops killed...but that's why he was da MAN!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message |