berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 10:49 PM
Original message |
Just Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. He admitted to violating the Constitution and committing a felony,... |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 10:54 PM by Just Me
,...on national tee-vee, in addition to seeking to attempting the spread of his wacked-out war to the U.S.A.
The man and his minions are domestic enemies to our democratic republic. They are freaks.
Can we arrest them, now?
|
tularetom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
he is really a minion rather than the man, but that's immaterial compared to the need for them to be removed from office.
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 10. Nancy Pelosi for President in 2006! n/t |
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Not just A felony,,, Thousands of felonies!!!! |
|
Did anyone ever see the movie The Firm? I think we've just found the way to shut down the firm of Bendini Lambert and Locke.
Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (USC Title 50 Chapter 36 Subchapter 1) specifically prohibits the government from doing what the President has secretly ordered and it is a serious felony with major penalties. The President has publicly confessed to this felony on national television. He ordered government agencies to engage in spying on thousands of American citizens without a warrant when the Congress made specific provisions in law to cover all circumstances, even emergency situations so that the government could listen in for up to 72 hours before obtaining a warrant, plenty of time to find and convince a judge. There is no excuse for this action, yet the President has done so anyways. That the President has colluded with others to do so, also makes this a conspiracy subject to fine and imprisonment up to 5 years per count under USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371. That he has chosen to hide it from the public, the Congress, law enforcement agencies, and the Courts through secret findings and secret orders may also be a case for obstruction of justice under USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1512 paragraph (b). The penalties for illegal wiretaps are severe, up to 5 years and $10,000 per count. The President has admitted to reauthorizing this violation of the law 30 separate times and thousands of phone calls have been intercepted.
The time has come for Prosecutor Fitzgerald to step forward and finally take the gloves off.
It is definitely time for the Congress to convene impeachment hearings.
|
jmatthan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I think someone has to turn on the toaster! Who? |
goforit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. He's not toast till he is arrested and convicted. Impeachment?..... |
|
is just a formality and won't do a damn thing to these a**holes!!!
|
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. I ain't sticking the fork in the toaster, let him burn |
Rageneau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. If he IS toast, the GOP and MSM will start calling him a club sandwich. |
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Said in my best Homer Simpson voice
|
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message |
| 9. The only reason we know that is because |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 01:14 AM by BuyingThyme
HE DID WAGE WAR IN THE U.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HE ADMITTED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EDIT for clarification: Bush is arguing that he spied on U.S. citizens according to his force resolution which was a War Powers resolution. The reason he needs to cite his War Powers resolution is because he was using his war powers; he was waging war. Simple logic.
|
Just Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Had he not known he didn't have authority, he wouldn't have asked for it. |
|
B-U-S-T-E-D!!!
He waged war against us, anyway. That's called T-R-E-A-S-O-N!!!
|
spinbaby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. He's not toast until... |
|
...they actually bother to mention it on the news.:grr: :grr:
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message |