Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-03 05:03 PM
Original message |
| If they really believed their lies |
|
If they really believed their lies about WMD, wouldn't they be more concerned about finding them AND Saddam? I mean if it were really true, Saddam would be driving around Iraq in a mobile bioweapons lab turned RV and carting a suitcase A-bomb - and they would have our troops positioned accordingly. But they know they don't have to worry about that cuz they know it was all a hoax.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-03 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Excellent Point! And one that gets lost in the verbage of not believing |
|
them, anyway!
They would be acting a lot differently if they were actually worried about where those "WMD" are!! bush and blair are so incredibly lame.
:toast:
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Why did they attack Iraq and not North Korea? |
|
Because they knew North Korea had WMD and Iraq didn't. Great lesson for the rest of the world.
|
DoctorMyEyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-03 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. ooooooowwwwwww........ |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 13th 2026, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |