|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:24 AM Original message |
| Scientific American: FDR may not have had polio |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WilliamPitt
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Interesting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Faygo Kid
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Interesting. He was devoted to his "polios," though |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Agreed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Xithras
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Interesting, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. I concur |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Xithras
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. I wouldn't worry too much about that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FDRrocks
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Wow.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Apparently when paralysis first hit FDR |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FDRrocks
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:51 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. His weight fluctuated... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. The fourth term was not a wise decision |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FDRrocks
|
Tue Nov-04-03 01:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 17. I know this... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pastiche423
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Please do not use the term |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elperromagico
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 15. I apologize |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pastiche423
|
Tue Nov-04-03 01:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. No problem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WoodrowFan
|
Tue Nov-04-03 08:46 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. Is it ok |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hlthe2b
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. I think its a major stretch based on questionable assumptions: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pastiche423
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. It makes sense to me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hlthe2b
|
Tue Nov-04-03 01:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 16. "It matters not what he had, but what he did."-- Exactly.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JohnKleeb
|
Tue Nov-04-03 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. Most interesting news Ive heard |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC