|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:21 AM Original message |
Will Dean privatize Social Security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. No flames here--but no, I don't think he will, given the chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
48. "conservative" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Julien Sorel
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. If this issue is important to you, and you're anti-privatation, it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. This is why I ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Julien Sorel
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I apologize for the lack of clarity in my original post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boilerbabe
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
29. There's always the worry that someone will not be able to fulfill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. Look how many Democrats voted to privatize Medicare just now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. Dean most likely would not BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's a judgment call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. This thread we call 'research' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I want to know what your esteemed friend thinks about this more than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:22 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Because he sees Dean as a serious fiscal conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:57 AM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Perhaps your friend has gone to school on Deans record as governor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:59 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. That's part of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:02 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. You mean the article which is completly error ridden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 07:52 AM Response to Reply #38 |
57. No, the one where Dean says about himself that he's for deregulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 09:37 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Some folks love to jump on buzzwords |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:25 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Dean admitted that the deregulation he wanted so much was bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:27 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I appreciate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 03:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
53. It's also a leap many make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:54 AM Response to Reply #53 |
73. Howard Dean is NOT related to Dean Witter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:59 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:06 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:16 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:23 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. That's right. You got me. I hate debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 07:55 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. I have to agree with sandnsea's sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
45. A "judgement call" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. It's all one has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:33 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Can you give me your perspective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:42 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:54 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. And part of the work isn't talking to other people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 03:16 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. It's not ALL the work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 03:51 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. No-you're dead wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. I think he has spoken out against privitization. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
8. Doesn’t it bother you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Out of the clear blue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:05 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Will Clark privatize the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. The deregulation talk he put up the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Julien Sorel
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Privatize the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 08:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
59. This thread is about SS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfecap
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:46 AM Original message |
No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
18. Outstanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfecap
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:15 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Welcome. Will I have personally talked with him about this subject... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Totally cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boilerbabe
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
30. Thanks you said it better than I just did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajabr
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
9. Not a chance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Outstanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 09:03 AM Response to Reply #19 |
60. Outstanding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:09 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:34 AM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Yeah, damn Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:26 AM Response to Reply #60 |
68. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retyred
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
10. I hadn't thought of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pruner
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. what past statement vs present statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retyred
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
33. Since you asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. Nobody knows what Dean will do. We know what he SAYS he will do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
14. why refute the charge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
15. A quote from his site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retyred
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:04 AM Response to Reply #15 |
39. Not to nit pick but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:14 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. I did that on purpose. I heard him say it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fabius
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
25. I see no reason to believe this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boilerbabe
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. I agree, it's going to be a big job to undo all this...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boilerbabe
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
28. From what I know, Dean would not privatize SS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
31. a few things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:00 AM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Answers to both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:06 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I wasn't criticising you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 02:06 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Oh, I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
55. It would be inconsistent with the rest of his policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
56. I will think for a little about that, and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
61. Disgusting display, Pitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
63. If I may quote Josh from West Wing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgorth
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
65. No chance of Dean doing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:21 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I prefer "Dean Watch" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:37 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Why the #Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CMT
![]() |
Wed Nov-26-03 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
70. since no evidence is given to support that Dean would actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC