|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:31 AM Original message |
Why Do "Dean-TAX" Threads Ignore Dean's Tax Plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. What plan? I see lots of political rhetoric... *nm* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. that easily can be said of any of Clark's domestic policy plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. If Dean was running on his record you might have a case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Rhetoric - that's mildly amusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Dean prefers to use the term 'resinstate' when discussing removing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 02:20 AM Response to Reply #6 |
67. "Removing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. Details, details, details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. OH yeah, Its more money, more than last week, but same as last year! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:30 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. No, don't you let the weasel get away with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Ok, I get what your saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. He can't, he's not a magician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I'm going to stop on this point for 2 reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:11 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I was being sarcastic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Well, then all the more reason to quit this debate, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. NO, that's personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Listen, you are the one who said you practically hate the man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:03 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I want a Democratic President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:48 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Again, Why Ignore Dean's OVERALL Tax Plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:11 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Personal attacks, again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:16 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Posts all over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:21 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:30 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Sorry, you can't hijak your own thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:52 AM Response to Reply #29 |
59. Dean's "overall plan" is a lot of platitudes with nothing concrete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
50. If I get a dollar an hour raise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:54 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. And, thanks to inflation, going back to your two-year old salary is a cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. The RNC and certain posters would rather we ignore economics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
62. Dean's chat about taxes is as deceptive as Bush's and Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 01:02 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Another false dichotomy Dean pushes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmbo
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. Bush's "tax cut" is actually a tax increase... on our children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Ugh. I can't stand hearing that mantra -- "returning to Clinton levels." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. That's assuming our children will pony up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Maybe some of theose "Family Values" might take hold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. I have to feed them today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 03:57 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. There you go again.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:05 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. No, there YOU go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I can't believe you are arguing it, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 04:36 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. They won't magically disappear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:08 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Some will, some won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:46 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I live in Oregon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:57 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. The only thing wrong with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:10 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. He can't control the states, one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. You Act As If It Were A Stealth Program! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:31 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. That's not what he's said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:34 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 07:05 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. I don't understand why it's an "either - or" scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 07:21 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Not what he said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:39 AM Response to Reply #42 |
54. This is like reverse Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:22 AM Response to Reply #28 |
37. We can't refund state programs without federal revenue sharing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Reformed tax code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:41 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Actually, you have been battling two fronts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 05:52 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Good points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:37 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Actually, the modest medium to lower incomes didn't get a check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 06:43 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. This year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 07:04 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. He didn't get one in 2001 either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 07:29 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. This year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
53. But people know that their local taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:27 AM Response to Reply #16 |
52. If Dean's changes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
51. Why doesn't Dean say in the debates that he won't reverse all of Bush's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:49 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Because he will reverse all of Bush tax cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hep
![]() |
Sat Dec-06-03 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
55. You see, When it comes to bashing Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:50 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. That is so true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajabr
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:54 AM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Spot on, Hep! This is absolutely true. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
57. Cant See The Forest For The Trees? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajabr
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 12:58 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Well said, burning bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 02:11 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. Why does he call tax cutters Bush-lite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-03 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
65. Krugman Lays Out Why Dean's Plan Is A Loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC