Wow, that's a good article. I've read most of those ideas before, but the author did a pretty good job of making it all easier to understand - I'm really quite ignorant of economics.
I wonder why the Ask Jeeves link ws provided? The actual URL is
http://www.aamovement.net/viewpoints/euro_vs_dollar.htmlThe idea that true global equality is incompatible with Western affluence is nothing new, nor is the idea that the West might inevitably crash and burn in the face of various powerful forces.
It's easy to see how this could scare the Hell out of people, but problems aren't helped by ignoring them. We have no choice but look this one square in the eye.
Also, I suspect it's actually possible to carve a happy ending out of this mess - though it would probably be extraordinarily difficult, and we can't even begin to make headway as long as that Awful Asshole is our pResident.
Here are two partial solutions:
1. Americans can simply dispense with the crap and learn to live a more intelligent and "economically just" lifestyle. Anyone ever heard of ENERGY CONSERVATION? Do we really need all those big cars? Do we need all the gadgetry and styrofoam? Is it time to seek out new ways to share resources, the rent and living space?
2. There's another vast reservoir of wealth. It's called Corporate America. Bill Gates, Paul McCaw, and other corporate officials possess fabulous wealth, as do their army of "gatekeepers," including media executives, public school officials and on and on.
If we were to declare a sort of jihad against these sick bastards and TAKE THEIR WEALTH - which, for the most part, is really OUR wealth... well, just imagine the possibilities.
Now don't misquote me. I'm not arguing for armed revolution or physical attacks against America's Greatest Scum. There are legal, or quasi-legal, ways of doing it.
But as long as Americans don't have the guts to hold our oppressors accountable, we truly deserve what we get.
By the way, if my last two paragraphs conjure up images of "socialism," then you can guess why that word is so reviled by conservatives. They know that the great labor wars of yesteryear were fought - and largely won - by Socialists, which were far more ethical, powerful and effective than today's Democrats. They also know that "socialism" - in the broadest sense of the term - doesn't necessarily equate with Godless communism.
Even something as innocent (and necessary) as government regulation equates with socialism in the conservatives' lexicon. But if the general public learned to equate socialism with "social justice," I suspect alarm bells would go off in Microsoft headquarters and the White House alike.