Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:47 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Dracula 2000 is a crime against cinema. |
|
So, I finally caught this abomination last night. Let me count the ways it is so unutterably awful. - The camera angles. This is not an episode of Batman, people. - Dracula. Oh look, it's that guy people hire when they can't get Dougray Scott. Why does his hair always look salon perfect? - Dracula's harem. You're supposed to be seductive, you know. Hang on, is one of them Vitamin C? Bloody hell. - Who designed this movie? Why does it look like the lost episode of the Red Shoe Diaries? - The whole 'Dracula as Judas' plot. An abomination. Truly, truly bollocks. It also gives the heretical suggestion that Christ's love is not infinite, and his mercy is not extended to Judas, thus destroying 2000 years of Christianity in one fell swoop. - Slow-mo. Slow-mo never looks good. So cheap, so tacky, so wrong.
|
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. In saw that on TV at a friend's house |
|
You forgot to mention the Virgin product placement. And the horrible, horrible plot and acting.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 6. And the flashbacks to the crucifixion. |
|
Really, really bad. Like a really bad Duran Duran video.
|
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. There was a Dracula 2000? |
|
Oy.
I liked "Bram Stoker's Dracula," visually. Plot- and acting-wise, it was an abomination. You're telling me this is worse?
|
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. I can tell you it is much, much worse (nt) |
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. In fact, I'm telling you it's a million times worse. |
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 10. I loved Gary Oldman as Dracula! |
|
Yes, it was visually stunning and very sexual. I can't remember ever being disappointed in GO's acting.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-12-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. Agreed. With the possible exception of Sid and Nancy. |
malatesta1137
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
was (is) the only possible Dracula. Bela Lugosi always made me laugh, he looked like my grandfather. They don't make great horror films like Hammer Studio's anymore.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Dracula AD 1972 is the only good Dracula movie with a year in the title. |
Bryan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. It's dreadful. But its sequel, "Dracula II: Ascension", is almost fun |
|
...featuring Jason Scott Lee as the best kung fu priest since Stuart Devenie in Peter Jackson's Brain Dead.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Yeah, it's a fairly specific genre - Kung Fu Vampire Killing Priest. |
|
My vote goes to Jesus in Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter.
|
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-11-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 26th 2026, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |