|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
mr blur
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 02:51 PM Original message |
As if you didn't know - Deckard was a replicant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. That replicants care more about life than we do says a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkTirade
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I suppose it's a little more special when you know you're going to run out of time before too long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 01:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Exactly the point. Those not interested in grasping existence fully appear to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woofless
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. Blade Runner is one of my all time faves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Cannon
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. If that is true, it's a cheap twist and renders the movie into... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah, the replicants in the book were obviously flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 09:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. No, that's a coincidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 06:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. A coincidence that was specifically added back in the director's cut? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Not a coincidence as "Oops! How did that get in there?!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac
![]() |
Sun Sep-30-07 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bullshit! Ridley Scott is lying! Deckard was a human. Here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. And if you have a replicant police officer, why make him so much weaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. How about when he gets his ass kicked by Leon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. There are different model replicants, including heavy laborers (Leon). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
8. What is it with Harrison Ford's characters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. It turns out that Indiana Jones was really a nazi spy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. And he stole the election to become president in "Air Force One" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Oh great, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
15. There Are Novels That Continue The Story, And This Contradicts Them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. He wasn't in the book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
17. It was great to debate that possibility. Scott is a dumbass for ending the debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Fortunately, Scott has no more authority than you or I in this debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Hey, good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
19. Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Scott denied that he was in the past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Yes, he's said otherwise before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
21. I love that people are still debating this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Not at all! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. but it raises an interesting question about the literary integrity of a story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr blur
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 07:49 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Hmm... what about the unicorn? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 08:17 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Threefer madness! (Oh, wait--wrong subject) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr blur
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Hmm... what about the Yak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. Well, duh, just read the novel. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Oct-01-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. ack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
28. After he fucked up HANNIBAL so terribly, I find it hard to take Scott very seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. IMO Scott is one of the most over-rated and over-praised directors in the industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. But when that is 'Alien' and 'Blade Runner' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Sure, but what has he done for me lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 09:27 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I love you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym
![]() |
Tue Oct-02-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
34. I didn't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC