|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:07 AM Original message |
There are too many states nowadays. Please eliminate three. P.S. I am not a crackpot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. This one could get ugly quick...ain't touching it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beer Snob-50
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
2. this is easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yes but I could live with the Yankees - rather get rid of Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beer Snob-50
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. boviously you don't live in new england!!! LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. You can't just eliminate the state, you have to combine states to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. Connecticut: Bush country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. You might add something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. Texas, Hawaii, Alaska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. States with populations less than D.C. get consolidated. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:45 AM Original message |
Right now, I'm looking at AZ and Oklahoma. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
8. *double post* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. I would combine Wyoming, Idaho and Montana |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Wydahona? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
42. Wydahellnot?-------nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
57. That certainly sounds nicer than "Wymountaho" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. The States of Confusion, Panic, Despair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Why do you hate America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'd make all the Conferederate states unify into one, then get rid of it. Then Illinois and Utah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. But Obama is from Illinois |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. A lot of the birthers would be eliminated in my Confederate States manuever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Yes but Oily Taintz would still be there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
51. I live in Arkansas..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Go back and read the OP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. Combine the Dakotas, Virginias and Carolinas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 04:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. No fucking way. North Carolina has all the good stuff and we don't feel like sharing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A HERETIC I AM
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. North Carolina has Research Triangle Park. South Carolina has... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #54 |
73. Duke vs. South of the Border |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:03 PM Response to Reply #54 |
75. "Break SC off and let it float out to sea." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #44 |
69. South Carolina has Mark Sanford |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
63. Then split the Californias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #63 |
71. We could have five Californias. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hvn_nbr_2
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. First three to secede. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. Delaware should become part of Maryland, since Delaware seems hell-bent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Ted Kauffman needs to run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Steele has actually never won a real election on his own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Nuevo Leon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chemenger
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
24. Just three??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Wait you would get rid of Minnesota - what about Al Franken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Minnesota? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
80. If Sarah still lives here, we haven't seen her in months... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
26. If Delaware is no longer a state, does it become Delawore? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:33 PM Original message |
It becomes Delawas. Or Delawere. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
28. Hawaii, Alaska, and Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
81. I agree with you on Alaska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. Texas, Arizona, and Alaska |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosie1223
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
30. First, I'd combine Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosie1223
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Just kidding, like everyone else on this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Whoa...sorry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosie1223
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. No Problem! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. Geezus fucking christ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
32. I don't think we have enough states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. 1 Dakota. WVA joins VA. RI joins CT. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
35. I am still fairly certain that Kansas does not and never has existed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:32 AM Response to Reply #35 |
70. I'm guessing you haven't watched "The Wizard of Oz" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. WHAT? It's a documentary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
39. Combine the Dakotas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
40. Get rid of all states starting with "I" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftinOH
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
43. North Dakota & South Dakota should be joined together -seriously; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carlyhippy
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. HA! maybe with both Dakotas combined they may actually hit 1 million people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
45. Texas, Alaska, and Alabama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
46. How about if we just simplify the names? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shell Beau
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
47. No. This is stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
48. As someone who's heard his fair share of "Floriduh" jokes, I'll pass on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miscsoc
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
49. I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missourah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
50. California should be broken into three pieces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
67. Please elaborate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. It isn't about improving the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
53. Confusion. War. Fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
55. Think how spastic a 47 star flag would look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:34 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Here's a 47 star flag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. That cool but still spastic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
58. North Dakota, Texas, and the one I can't pick. We can keep Rhode Island. It's cute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
59. The south, the west, and Alaska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Thu Apr-29-10 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
64. Texas. Texas. And Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apex3350
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
65. texass, wyoming, and utah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
66. Negatory. I would add 3. Perhaps more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:32 AM Response to Original message |
68. "Whenever I view your magazine, I don't see one wrinkled face or a single toothless grin. For shame! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Troop
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
76. Well, of course NY would have to go.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
77. I would eliminate and combine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Another vote for giving Alaska to Canada! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
78. Those tiny northeastern ones have no business being separate states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. We could give ME back to MA, but that wouldn't help with the spelling issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
79. I wouldn't mind if Alaska left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoGOPZone
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
82. Last in, first out. Hawaii, Alaska and Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Palin is the Lower 48's problem now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
86. A 47-star flag would look like crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC