TheMightyFavog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-10 07:55 PM
Original message |
| Rudolph the red nosed reindeer In High Definition??? |
|
What point is there to airing a television program first aired in 1964 in high-definition?
|
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. If you have to ask.... |
guitar man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's so you can get a real good look at all the flaws in the old film :silly:
|
nolabear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. My EYES! Oh God, MY EEEEEYYYEEESSSSS!!!! |
EOTE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I assume it's also going to be broadcast in its original aspect ratio of 4:3 (1.33)? So I guess this will be pillar-boxed HD as well.
That's not to say that films made before 1964 can't be transferred well into HD. Properly maintained 35MM film still looks amazing to this day. I'm guessing when they finally get around to transferring films like Ben Hur, they will look very good.
|
kentauros
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. You should never assume proper ratios on broadcast HD |
|
because unless you're watching TCM, or MGM or one of the old-movie movie channels, you can bet good money that it will be stretched and/or cropped.
I keep the non-HD channels in my on-screen guide for this very reason. I can't stand watching a formerly 4 : 3 show stretched to 16 : 9. I want people to have normal-width shoulders and round eyes! I could not care less about having black bars on the sides, any more than I care about seeing black bars on the top and bottom. I want original ratios dammit! :D
|
EOTE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. At least in the commercials, it's displayed in 4:3. |
|
With a wintery screenscape displayed on the sides. My daughter watches a VHS copy of Rudolph often when she visits my folks. Somehow I'm guessing this HD version isn't going to look that much better.
|
Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. I saw it last year in so-called HD. Not much of a difference to me. |
kentauros
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 12. You can let us know if they stick to that format then |
|
;)
Maybe it's a new tactic in trying to get around the rabid viewers that "must have the screen filled!!!"
I'm just remembering how you'll see a movie where the opening credits are letterboxed, and the moment they're over, it's back to pan & scan, crop & stretch.
|
Supply Side Jesus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. wait for the 3D version |
|
:eyes:
some things should just be
|
Beer Snob-50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. when is this classic on??? nt |
Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Tonight on ABC at 8pm ET. |
CBGLuthier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. because it was originally on FILM, it can be improved |
|
Anything done on film, like most of The Twilight Zone, Star Trek, and so on can be improved with a high resolution scan from a quality print.
Yes, it won't be in widescreen aspect but that has absolutely nothing to do with whether it is high def or not.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |