Anyone Else Find "Dean Will Win" and "Kerry Will Win" Threads Tedious?

[DrFunkenstein]

I'm not really sure what their point is, but I do know their worth.

Smug predictions based on facts skewed to one's bias apparently have come to replace our once-interesting debates.

:evilfrown:

If I wanted to hear cheerleading, I would go to the respective candidates website.

:puffpiece:

Of course, let's give a shout out for the "Dean can't win" and the "Kerry can't win" threads. They're much better. At least they're negative.

[Feanorcurufinwe]

1. Yes, but it's natural.

[blm]

2. Yes...ANY Dem can beat Bush.

Just in varying numbers.

[Duder]

3. No offense but...

...these type of threads are a little slow and boring. ;)

I do agree though that can and can't win are mostly subjective.

[Kolesar]

4. I have been experimenting with the "ignore" feature

It is an imprecise instrument, at best.

[Northwind]

5. Eh

They don't really bother me. I just pass thr time compiling a book of crow recipes for all the Dean bashers come 11/04. :evilgrin:

[DrFunkenstein]

8. All The Dean Bashers?

How many do you think there are? I think you are being fooled by the intensity of the very few around here. Personally, I don't know what they seek to accomplish, but I think they are the exception not the rule. The same for Dean supporters. Between the smugness, the negativity, and the petty squabbling over minute details at the expense of larger issues, I'm not sure why I bother showing up anymore.

[gully]

6. Not as tedious as Dean will lose or Kerry will lose threads...

;)as you mentioned in your post already

[w13rd0]

7. exactly...

...the "can't/won't win" threads are hands down the most tiresome...