Edmundo
(30 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:30 AM
Original message |
| Kerry-Clark or Clark-Kerry? |
|
Today I am leaning torwards Kerry-Clark. But I still think this would be a great ticket agains Bush in 2004!
|
GOPEC
(217 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. You posed the question... |
|
"Kerry-Clark or Clark-Kerry?"
The answer is: Yes.
The answer is yes in all cases, Sharpton-Lieberman, Lieberman-Sharpton, Dean-Kucinich, Kucinich-Dean...
|
Born_a_Democrat
(329 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Kerry's going to be lucky if his campaign doesn't fall apart soon..much less win the nomination
|
gully
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Dean/Clark, Dean/Kerry... |
mndemocrat_29
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That's still my preference.
Although that Lieberman-Kucinich, Sharpton-Graham, Dean-Braun, whoever, is pretty good too.
ABB!!!
|
phillybri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'll take either, I prefer Kerry/Clark...
|
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Clark-Kerry= Bush/Rove nightmare
|
molly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
AWD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
....I think Clark/Kerry.
Yes, absolutely. Clark will finish 2nd/Kerry will finish 3rd.
|
Edmundo
(30 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Because if Dean wins the nomination I think we are going to have a hard time beating Bush. I'm not saying he can't beat Bush but Rove is going to have a much easier time.
Dean has my vote against Bush and everybody's vote here but say bye-bye to swing voters...
I was a Dean enthusiast until seeing an unprepared candidate fumbling and getting grilled by Tim Russert. Dean is abrasive and he even snapped at Stephanopoulos about NAFTA.
Rove is going to paint a horrible picture of Dean and it's going to be easy.
Clark-Kerry/Kerry-Clark is going to be a nightmare for the Republicans.
|
kang
(254 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-03 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Obviously, the nominee has my vote, but |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 03:24 PM by kang
it's a interesting thought putting our two "heavy"s on nat'l security and foreign policy on the ticket together. But if Clark gets the nomination, I'm still inclined to lean towards Edwards or Dean as VP. After all, Kerry's a shoe-in for Senate after defeating Weld (one of the more popular Republicans in MA) and we don't want to leave another Dem seat up for the grabs.
Unfortunately, Edwards has already done this (it's not that I don't understand though). Dean as VP w/a few good-will and substantive trips to foreign countries under his belt (plus, some additional help with nat'l press experience) could also become an even more formidable presidential candidate. All the combos sound ok with me...as long as they win in 2004!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 11th 2026, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |