The Elephant In The Bailout Roomhttp://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-the-elephant-in-the-bailout-room-2009-3Why are we so frustrated by the latest Geithner giveaway? Many reasons, starting with this:
Each of the bailed-out institutions has tens or hundreds of billions of dollars that could be used to cover losses before the taxpayer had to cough up a dime. And with the exception of Lehman Brothers (and, now, General Motors), these gigantic pools of money have been protected to the tune of 100 cents on the dollar.
Who are we talking about?
The bondholders. The folks who lent AIG, Citigroup, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other disasters the hundreds of billions of dollars that they subsequently vaporized.
In any fair world, the bondholders would lose everything before any taxpayer money was put on the line. Ever since Lehman Brothers, however, Tim Geithner & Co. have been so afraid of a Lehman-repeat that they refuse to even publicly discuss the possibility of making bondholders share the pain. Whenever anyone suggests this idea, moreover, Geithner & Co. immediately dismiss it by saying it would lead to another Lehman.
At best, this is wrong. At worst, it's disingenuous.
The reason Lehman caused such havoc was that it was an uncontrolled and unexpected bankruptcy. No one is suggesting that AIG, Citi, et al, be forced into one of those.
What LOTS of people are suggesting, including Paul Krugman, is that Citi, et al, be put into a managed receivership. This is what happened to WaMu last fall, and the process went so smoothly that few folks can even remember it.
WaMu bondholders took a hit. General Motors bondholders will take a hit. So why can't the bondholders of Citi, AIG, etc, take a hit?