|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 08:18 AM Original message |
A Message to the Nearly Converted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. We've turned the corner of the "hockey stick" on so many levels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Technology might save a few of us........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
3. What could possibly go wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Thanks, but the applause belongs to Jason Bradford. I just clapped along... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. Pretty clearly stated, and true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Here's a comment I posted in that thread, that bears on your question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. a "transformation of consciousness from an economic paradigm to an ecological one" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. What you describe here made me think about economics vs. ecology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. As you point out, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 01:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I like that analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 06:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Wendell Berry addresses this sort of concept in a lot of his essays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 07:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Your last paragraph, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. My comment is meant more in regards to basic needs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuvuj
![]() |
Sun Jun-14-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Because corps are "people"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terry in Austin
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Great piece and commentary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. "Business as usual", I believe. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terry in Austin
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Ah -- thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Voluntary or involuntary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 07:55 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Can you elaborate on/attempt to prove one proposition here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. "Proof" of that idea is of course impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 07:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Oh, Glider, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 10:21 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. There are millions upon millions of others doing the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #23 |
89. This "spiritual" view is why the green movement has failed so unbelievably hard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. Gee, why does every graph have an exponential appearance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Thu Jun-11-09 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. Conversion? So this really is religious mumbo-jumbo parading as ecological reasoning, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. You are as obnoxious as fuck-all and have no business here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 07:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Is this a Forum? Or a Group? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 08:09 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. "all ideas are subject to scrutiny and must stand on their own strengths and weaknesses" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Sat Jun-13-09 02:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Day now sufficiently brightened! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
excess_3
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. point 7, car dealerships |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guardian
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
28. Thanks for the article--it was a great laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Oh yeah, that dang discredited hockey stick graph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. "Is the US National Academy of Sciences qualified to comment on global warming?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I'm just waiting for the OISM petition to surface . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
excess_3
![]() |
Sat Jun-13-09 03:59 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. the results of the NAS vote was? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Sat Jun-13-09 10:42 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I don't remember voting on Newton's theory of gravity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-12-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. So am I to understand that you're not "nearly converted"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuvuj
![]() |
Sun Jun-14-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. The conversion process... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
38. I agree with the premise, I disagree with the implications. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
39. The article ignores artificial intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. The terms of the debate are not determined solely by you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. AI doesn't exist yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. So, let me get this straight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Learn to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. I read your remark just fine, and I stand by my previous statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 10:48 AM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Of course it's an opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. There's a difference between a supported and unsupported opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Natural intelligence got us into this mess. How would the artificial variety get us out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. By increasing the pace of innovation by several orders magnitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. "AI is the last invention humans will ever produce" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #44 |
52. Innovation is what allows this discussion to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:56 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Yin and yang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. The key is that you place value on the internet, but seemingly want to convice others... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. You're projecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 02:18 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. The thing is that you're hung up on cost when it is simply non-existant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 05:10 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Good luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Yeah, it's religious to ascribe to an objective reality based view of "economics." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 07:48 AM Response to Reply #72 |
78. I don't know where you learned your history, but that's not how it happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Nice and concise! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 08:58 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Never read Zerzan nor Quinn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 09:02 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. It's wonderful that this is now being taught in Grade 9. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 09:09 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. It's not being taught across the board, but I taught it in grade 9... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 12:44 AM Response to Reply #80 |
86. Yeah, the whole "agriculture caused authoritarianism" argument is quite common with Zerzan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 12:39 AM Response to Reply #78 |
84. Tools do not indicate being out of equllibrium with the environment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #84 |
87. I never said this is how things "have" to be.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 11:34 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. You never said this is the way things "have" to be but you say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 08:04 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 10:44 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Honestly, I don't see much disagreement here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. The disagreement isn't about physics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. You err on the side of convention and aren't forward thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Mon Jun-15-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. For a longer discussion that has this same general focus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 02:05 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. It's either that or a varient of that, or all known life in the universe goes extinct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 04:36 AM Response to Reply #39 |
48. The article also "ignores" low cost fusion, high mortality pandemics, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 04:43 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I think my sigline thoroughly debunks the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 06:32 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I don't have siglines turned on ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. My sig says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 03:08 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Thanks for posting that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Water, water everywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Hallelujah! The dilemma is solved! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Since most of the worlds populations live in cities, and cities have comparatively small... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Your first point is EXTREMELY debatable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 02:10 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I think you ought to be a bit more open minded than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 05:00 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Urban vs. rural pollution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. I addressed that, did you even read what I wrote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. How do you restrict the city to a niche that doesn't expand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Populations drop as living standards go up. They wouldn't expand because their populations... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 12:26 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. But what if a city wanted to expand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 01:25 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. So what if they did expand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Fri Jun-19-09 08:28 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Our current consumption is what we did about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #79 |
85. It would make our consumption irrelevant because we would recycle everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Releasing self-replicating machines lose into the world's oceans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. They're not self-replicating, they're hive replicating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
69. The Message of Overconsumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC