|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 03:42 PM Original message |
Cesium-137 still detected in samples of strawberries, kale, and grass from CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. What do you mean "still"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Are you a low level radiation expert now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. This isn't even high enough to be called LLR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's not a one time exposure if this goes on for years, and it's on many items nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Yep... And it's so incredibly low that even that is irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. They don't know very much about low level radiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. But "they" can still count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You and the nuke industry like to move the goalposts, it sucks that we have contaminated food nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Sorry. Same goalposts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. You don't know enough on the topic, just another "not harmful to human health" story nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Strange that it's exactly what everyone who DOES know says too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. There are plenty of doctors and physicists who disagree nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You mean Dr. Happy Nuclear Bunny? Oh yes he will agree "NO HARM TO HUMAN HEALTH" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Nope. Every single health physicist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Here's one who knows a lot more than you do a PhD who studied the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 05:20 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. "Here's one" what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proverbialwisdom
![]() |
Sat May-28-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
77. Did you know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Hilarious and misleading as usual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Still wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. FBags lets slip out a kernel of truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Dodged the questions, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 03:49 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Yep? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 09:06 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Sure... no problem. Can do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. You are good at deciphering Nuke Speak SpoonFed! lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 05:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Do he only do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Oh right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Obviously the "adding up" is a bit beyond you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Bioaccumulation? Nah. Not in your world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 03:42 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Bioaccumulation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. And if only the reactors were spewing only Cs. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. "n/t" normally means that no text follows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Smoke and mirrors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Sigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 09:04 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Never heard of a biological half-life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
37. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. That analogy is, frankly, bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. From the site in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. You are a perky little fellow, always there. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. And desperate to try to change the discussion to happy nuclear bunny talk nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. You nuke dudes are really on your heels... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. You seem to still have reading comprehension problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proverbialwisdom
![]() |
Sat May-28-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
76. What are your views about this related topic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Sun May-29-11 06:46 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. Interesting and actually useful data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. OK, here's a very incomplete look... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Thanks for your work on that but I think you should learn about this guy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 12:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Actually, very little is 'coming over' now. And less all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. Meaningless, fraught with errors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. As the dude says: "BIOACCUMULATION, MAN!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinny Liberal
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 12:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Same. Box of california strawberries in my fridge right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinny Liberal
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Nowadays |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. If I had to pick, I'd be more concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinny Liberal
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
8. what kind of grass? the good kind? THAT's a problem, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. bummer, now that could be big news in Northern Cali |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. Ah yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. How about some perscpective!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Here is some perspective based on what really did happen with fallout in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
67. Wow, as disingenuous as ever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW
![]() |
Sat May-28-11 02:08 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. The FACTS are never disingenuous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Sat May-28-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. You just don't get it, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW
![]() |
Sun May-29-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. I guess I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amerfayed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
31. Interesting that you get most of your info from enenews and don't cite it... cut and paste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
32. Following Chernobyl... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
43. Anyone wonder why the anti-nukes have shifted to grass/kale/etc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Oh, I thought I read that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. You read wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 12:07 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. It's not over yet and Hillary cut a deal to stop EPA testing, clear from the timing of her visit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Hillary cut a deal to hide the radiation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 09:59 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. You ned to learn to put two and two together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 10:12 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 10:23 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. You are incapable of seeing the bigger political picture, and you think inside of a tiny box nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. By "bigger political picture" you mean interstellar, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Continue to trust that it's all happy nuclear bunnies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. There's a HUGE gap between the understatement of the TEPCOs of the world... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Sun May-29-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
81. Desperation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Sun May-29-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. That too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue
![]() |
Sat May-28-11 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
78. This is disturbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC