|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Xithras
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:09 PM Original message |
Give me a valid argument against national gun OWNER registration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's how the Nazis rouded up the weapons. No I'll keep my cannons thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Irrelevant. The constitution authorizes it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. A2 most certainly does not "authorize" it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackeye101
![]() |
Sun Jun-15-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
100. Enough Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. There is a right to bare arms not missle launchers or WMD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Codger
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not only is that the way the Natzi's confiscated all the weapons, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Well said Sir/Ma'am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Thanks and it's a Ma'am. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. I never, once suggested gun restrictions. Not once. Nothing in my proposal would limit gun ownership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boomer 50
![]() |
Sun Jun-15-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
98. Exactly the same line the Nazi's used. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. how did the "Natzi's" handle highway traffic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radioburning
![]() |
Wed Jun-04-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
88. Completely unrealistic, childish post. Going waaaaaay out on a limb to make a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed Jun-04-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. and yet you still dodged it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-05-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Deleted message |
AlinPA
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
69. A couple of guys in my sportsmen's club say there should be zero laws on guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Thu Jun-12-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
97. This 'Gun Confiscation is What Nazis Did' Line, Ma'am, Is Very Tiresome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boomer 50
![]() |
Sun Jun-15-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. You are exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Jun-18-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Always Fun When Someone Misses The Point Entirely, Sir, And Manages To Demonstrate The Point As Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boomer 50
![]() |
Fri Jun-20-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. So.... you advocate disarmament for everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Thu Jul-03-08 03:30 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. My Advocacy, Sir, Is Of Accurate References To History, Rather Than Distortions Of Its |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Jun-20-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #97 |
108. y'all come back now, y'hear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Practically, it's not a big deal. However, there is a lot of resistance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. because it would cost a lot of money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Thank you for pointing that out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
24. Which is why I said "Shall Issue". No infringement involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. IF yo are going to rely of jr's HomeLAnd gestapo to approve my application I wil take my chances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. Ditto, hear hear, and what YOU said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Will E Orwontee
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Your use of well regulated is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hooptie
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Quite the mental backflip there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. "a licensing program" is not a power the Government was granted. What part of Shall Not infringe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmsk8
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Counterflip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed May-21-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. you should have had a spotter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #25 |
41. The Congress has chosen to not regulate the miitia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
52. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. My biggest objection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Yes, because everyone who takes an Art class in high school can paint the Mona Lisa afterward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. They might not all be Jackson Pollocks, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrCory
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 06:42 AM Response to Reply #27 |
70. Following your logic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicalcamper
![]() |
Wed Jun-11-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
92. Good idea but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxidivine
![]() |
Thu Jun-12-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #13 |
96. You bought your guns out of paranoia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. Registration is a necessary component of confiscation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. Shall not be infringed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. What infringement? Shall Issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Registration is an infringement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
63. register to vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
54. And a psych exam... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irreverend IX
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. I can't see how it would reduce crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. Give me an example of how this would reduce gun crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
19. The Supreme Court has already ruled that a criminal in violation of gun laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxidivine
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
20. Well-regulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
21. After the gun confiscation of post-Katrina, I no longer think its paranoia to worry about the gov... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 05:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
42. "We're going to take all the guns" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
22. WHY... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
29. sounds like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot
![]() ![]() |
Thu May-15-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
34. Federal government has no authority to regulate non-commercial, intrastate transfers of used things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 05:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
55. Basic things are oft overlooked, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I appreciate your comment very much, Tejas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmsk8
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
35. It's illega |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed May-21-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. l |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
37. The government has the ability to tell that you own guns... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. just a note |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. A note to your note... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HK91-762mm
![]() |
Mon May-19-08 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
43. Trick question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed May-21-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. neat avatar you've got there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iiibbb
![]() |
Wed May-21-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
44. Isn't incumbent on the proponents of gun control to prove it would reduce crime or is consitutional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Wed May-21-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. it's so the antis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbo Teg
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
49. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxidivine
![]() |
Thu May-22-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. MOUNT UP!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
57. Here's a concrete example of why gun owner registration is bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. and just exactly how stupid are you going to feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Probably not as stupid as you will feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. yup, just another rotten woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Yup, just another evil, woman-hating man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. ...with a bunch of GUNS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. you've both got it, it seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Taking away peoples' civil rights because of ALLEGATIONS is neither liberal nor progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrCory
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 07:00 AM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Or, better yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 07:55 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. revelation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #72 |
76. Talk about irrelevancies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. well apparently that ain't so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. I'll just skip the bullshit and cut to the chase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrCory
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 06:21 AM Response to Reply #72 |
87. It certainly is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed Jun-04-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 06:34 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. I would guess the thinking might go like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. It will be interesting to see if this situation ever gets resolved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 08:54 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. I don't know this guy, obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stompk
![]() |
Fri Jun-20-08 07:32 PM Response to Reply #73 |
105. The revocation of his FOID card after a year is a great tool for law enforcement to keep him on his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. gunowner = guilty until proven innocent n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #65 |
78. Gun owner + Male = Two Strikes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. What does my race have to do with anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. hmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. In fact you have never SEEN anyone on this forum, so you really can't be sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. well that ain't quite so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stompk
![]() |
Fri Jun-20-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #58 |
104. ahhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-23-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
62. Regulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
67. An awful lot of crime is done via computer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Wed Jun-11-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
93. Because no one can guarantee that a registration data base will not be used to confiscate firearms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Wed Jun-11-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. watch out! watch out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karl_Bonner_1982
![]() |
Thu Jun-12-08 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
95. Some interpretations of Am. II are even more restrictive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xela
![]() |
Wed Jun-18-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
102. Because registration is useless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Thu Jun-19-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
103. All your provisions are met under US law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thirylaermi
![]() |
Fri Jun-20-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
107. Registration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Thu Jul-03-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
110. Perhaps we should have a series of tests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope
![]() |
Thu Jul-03-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
111. Two problems with this understanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Real_Talk
![]() |
Thu Jul-03-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC