|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:26 PM Original message |
California Democrat proposes mandatory gun registration ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Aw fuck that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sounds like bullshit to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Its not BS. Go read the news. Its right there for all to see !!! Yeah, CA!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. Oh I believe he's proposing it. I still think the concept is bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #59 |
82. Really? Willing to take your assault weapon to be checked out for legality? I didn't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
124. Did they microstamp your ganja? Mine burned up. Musta been a defect. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good, I certainly hope they do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. He'll lose his seat over this, you know that right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Doubtful that he would lose his seat. Look at his district. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. I just saw that, yeah he's safe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. And more to the point, its you "law-abiding gunowners" who are not safe if you dont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. You know it isn't a law yet right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:19 AM Response to Reply #40 |
109. And even if it did, it wouldn't apply outside California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. Why do you want to start a shooting war over the Constitution? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #63 |
104. What in the world are you talking about? What war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. "Go Feuer!!!"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 07:12 AM Response to Reply #20 |
117. I love Feuer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HALO141
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
172. Heil furher! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #172 |
175. Sump'in like that, yah ;) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
71. Yeah, Go Feuer! Get those rights!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. This can't be true - Ah ha! it's another NRA trick I bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. How does a registry limit your ability to own a firearm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. What this does is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. How many guns were confiscated in NO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. doesn't fucking matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
51. Lots of the looters WERE gun-owners. Oh yeah, you forgot about that fact. People were shooting at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. Uhhh not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #57 |
77. And the police and NG were still shot at by civilians. Your point was......? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:32 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. My point was that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:37 AM Response to Reply #77 |
91. "Civilian" is a very encompassing term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #91 |
102. Another play on words? You need a dictionary, not decaf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. How is it a play on words that "civilian" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
74. Doesnt everybody shoot at helicopters , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. The city admitted to 700. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Better question is how many of you are going to jail if you dont comply with the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Yeah really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I dont care if its only CA. You come here, the new law will require you to register all your guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
53. Everybodies doing that ........Moving to California . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Thats true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:13 AM Response to Reply #53 |
107. So when did the moderators allow the use of the "F" word here on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. I've seen it used plenty when not as a pejorative addressed to a specific member of this forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
45. Probably won't be a felony level offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. Why not? Owning an assault weapon is right now. Ask the 200 + people charged with that crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Charged, but you didn't say convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #85 |
94. No there isn't. There is every reason to believe that anyone not registering will be charged with a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 08:46 AM Response to Reply #94 |
122. Once again Charged but you didn't say convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #94 |
151. How do you propose they find the non-registers? No-knock searches of every dwelling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:33 PM Response to Reply #151 |
185. Its real simple. Don't bring any non-registered gun out on the streets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #185 |
194. I must not be smoking enough crack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #81 |
93. 200+ over how many years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #25 |
113. What jails, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dashrif
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #113 |
144. na |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 07:15 AM Response to Reply #25 |
118. You're just here to stir up shit, aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 09:56 AM Response to Reply #25 |
126. Deleted message |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. As many as they could get their hands on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
47. How many does it take... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HALO141
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
173. Every one they could find. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. There's a history of registration leading to confiscation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. If you're a prohibited person, it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. So it doesn't infringe in any way of owning a firearm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Similar ruling, different right inside.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Haynes v. US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. There is the small matter of the expense and time required ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
50. Provided you possess the firearm illegally, it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
62. I guess my time and money mean nothing to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
84. What will you do.when they come for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:10 AM Response to Reply #84 |
106. "They" won't; he lives in Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:22 AM Response to Reply #84 |
110. See posts 63 and 66. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 07:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
119. Look up "poll tax." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taitertots
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
143. How does a registry limit your ability to post a blog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. This article states that Canada spent a billion dollars on registry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. the actual figure is over $2 billion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. If it helps anyone live to see another day its worth every cent we pay!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. How are you going to pay for it, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
43. Deleted message |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Thought exercise.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. Exactly, all your little "ban" on ammo is going to accomplish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. We can easily put a tax on new ammo and gun purchase, since you will have to register new guns at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
65. That wont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:06 AM Response to Reply #65 |
128. He forgot all about those county-line liquor stores. Just another prohi. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
183. If you make the tax high enough people will not be able to practice ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. He's talking about Canada's long gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. "If one citizen exercising her/his RKBA helps anyone live to see another day its worth every cent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. All you have to do is register ALL your guns and you can keep them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
58. LOL re "For now, that is !!!" That's what all who support a criminal's right to commit evil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #41 |
66. Since you so clearly imply that confiscation will follow soon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:08 AM Response to Reply #41 |
130. Ah, you just corrupted and made dishonest your argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
54. Has it prevented a single murder in Canada? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #54 |
69. It's prevented countless murders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. "countless", funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
75. Firearms are often used for self defense ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #26 |
127. Man, you like to waste money to serve your prohibitionism. P-yew! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Llewlladdwr
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
148. So you're willing to spend in excess of $2,000,00,000 to save a SINGLE life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #148 |
162. It's simple really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
150. Has it? Canadians pretty much regard it as an expensive, annoying, failure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
178. More people would be saved at far lower cost by giving free swimming lessons to poor kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. They spent almost 2 billion *Canadian* dollars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Today US and Canadian dollar are close to parity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 06:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
116. Sure, but the Canadian long gun registry goes back at least 15 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. What's a billion among friends (or governments..) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. Hard to pin down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. Thank you, Sacramento !!! Time to toughen up the AW ban laws too!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Are you dense or just intentionally obtuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. If you dont register we dont need to outlaw your guns, YOU are the outlaw now!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. And If I register my perfectly LEGAL off-list rifle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. The fact is that many gun owners wont register and will be found to be the criminals they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Go decaf, really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Its simple. Anytime you bring an unregistered gun out anywhere, you will be at risk of prison-time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. So you're going to have cops at every gun store and firing range now? LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. Interesting choice of language. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
80. Deleted message |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #60 |
132. You know what our boy from 'California, Uberalles" is by now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
177. The under-bridge dwellers usually do overplay their hands at some point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #46 |
76. How are you going to fund all the prisons with California's economic situation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:05 AM Response to Reply #46 |
141. That's nothing but a Fascist wet dream, cabluedem. I've been out shooting hundreds of times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #141 |
159. I was shooting and someone asked to see my "permit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #159 |
166. I take it the person was a Self-Appointed Range Nazi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #166 |
169. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
153. Right, post cops at every range ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
56. So, now you equate legal firearms owners to criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. It looks like they wrote number four while reading a list of her posts N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
72. Too bad you're not interested in actual criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #72 |
78. If I were a criminal, I would love gun control laws ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #72 |
86. What's sad is all the victims of gun crimes. That's when people who own guns kill someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Uhhhhhhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:29 AM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I guess I need to spell it out. They WERE law abiding citizens, who OWNED guns. Better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #90 |
92. And cars, credit cards, homes, sharp sticks or pots and pans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Firearms are not used in war to kill people? That's why the army uses pots and pans, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:57 AM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Deflection fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #90 |
98. Since you also believe that career criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Do you even read what you type? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Deleted message |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:55 AM Response to Reply #97 |
99. I wasn't talking about your bird crimes term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Hahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 06:26 AM Response to Reply #97 |
115. I guess that makes you the cat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #86 |
133. "other fowl crimes"? What were you doing to those chickens? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 06:23 AM Response to Reply #38 |
114. Some terms you should acquaint yourself with: "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 07:38 AM Response to Reply #114 |
120. the short answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. Ah yes, let's manufacture a new class of criminals out of whole cloth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #52 |
79. I have this theory that living in California with all the earthquakes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #79 |
108. Well, you can make some preps for earthquakes too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #79 |
152. After cali earthquakes, I always check the news at work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #152 |
158. I wish it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #158 |
161. Unfortunately, the tectonic plates are not moving such that KA would sink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
67. Who ARE you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 08:49 AM Response to Reply #67 |
123. The victim of a crime by a "law abiding gun owner", that's who. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #123 |
125. How do you plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:08 AM Response to Reply #123 |
129. So that makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #123 |
134. That does not make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #123 |
136. I had some stuff stolen by a black man when I was a college student |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #123 |
174. What was this crime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:21 PM Response to Reply #67 |
176. Sorry, forgot to add the link to Thrill-boy's anti-Civil Rights tirade... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
70. It will never pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naked_Ape
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #70 |
87. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
105. Now a thread in General Discussion as well, here's the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
112. My guess is that this isn't going anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
121. Also require them to wear bright safety orange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #121 |
135. Oh, damn! I'll have to sell my hot-pink gear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #121 |
139. Hmmm, forcing people you despise and consider "other" to wear identifying clothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #139 |
146. I'm the gun-control lobby? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #139 |
167. BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #121 |
145. How about mandatory tattoos while you're at it, onehandle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #145 |
147. No. That would be going too far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #147 |
155. Are you comparing yourself to Caesar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. Beware the ides of March. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #157 |
160. Deleted message |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #121 |
154. Reminds me of the yellow badge, Hilter required Jews to wear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #154 |
156. Tell it like it is, Rosa Parks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
131. Stupid fucktard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #131 |
137. One man's fucktard is another man's liberal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #137 |
138. False dilemma - A liberal can be a fucktard and vice-versa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #138 |
164. Here here! Authoritarians are the worst of all! N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #131 |
163. And they actually let fucktards who threaten violence have guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #163 |
165. Who made a threat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #163 |
168. What are you blathering about now, cabluedem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #163 |
180. I'd like to thank you for your help, but you're *reaallly* overplaying it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
140. What are the chances this thing is actually going to pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #140 |
142. Slim to none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #142 |
170. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #142 |
171. with California who can tell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #142 |
179. it has a hearing date set for 4/13/10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #179 |
181. OMFG! When it was introduced on 2/10, it was about increased fines for vandalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #181 |
182. thats a weird status update |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #181 |
184. Burn, baby, burn! Once its out of committee it's as good as law! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #184 |
187. The Supreme Court may have something to say about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #184 |
191. The legislature will run like hell from it once the analyst figures out the cost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 08:25 AM Response to Reply #181 |
189. "Bait and switch" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cabluedem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #142 |
186. You will rue the day you posted this dreck. It has a good chance of passing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #186 |
188. i think the hearing has just been canceled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #186 |
190. It's kind of pathetic how you don't realize that you've lost the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #186 |
192. Why would I rue the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #186 |
193. California has tried to register "assault weapons" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #193 |
195. "Military-style assault guns"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC