|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:20 PM Original message |
Rachel just called out the NRA and gun activists for killing DC representation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
76. And you're there to tell 'em what is, right? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. So you're only for some civil rights for DC residents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. So you're only for representation for DC if they accept the dictate of a lobbying group? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. it's called civil rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. no, it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Reserved to the people meant the states back then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. rubbish and everybody from tribe to stevens to ginsburg to roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. Forget it. You are talking to people with the same mindset as the American Life League |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
154. Thank you, but we've already read the GOP/NRA propaganda ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #154 |
162. You really think this is convincing argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #162 |
191. GOP/NRA are world class right wing propagandists . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #191 |
199. As usual, you dodge the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:14 PM Response to Reply #199 |
201. Unfortunately . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 05:49 AM Response to Reply #17 |
67. So how come the X Amendment lists the states and the people separately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 07:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
120. Drat, you beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #67 |
155. Clearly, the states enforce the rights of the people to be secure . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
98. Don't waste your time, this wall is made with very thick bricks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
153. Milita is a government issue -- and you're celebrating another right wing fascist SC decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #153 |
160. Well apparently the SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #160 |
196. How many aren't corporate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Bang-up job they did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. Now now, you *know* you aren't supposed to look at the *actual* crime and murder rates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
156. And you want to go backwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Deleted message |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Well, I'm fairly new here so I've missed all those comments by fucking morons who think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
93. You just made my list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
158. "you really should be campaigning to disarm cops unless you were a little disingenuous." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. "Jackboots"? You lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. It's a term long used since the Waco incident by "progressives." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
60. Jackboots does not equate to a Godwin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeloo
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. If you are going to quote the Constitution,you should use all of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Tell that to the SCOTUS, the various states who passed individual focused amendments.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
73. Read some of the writings of the founding fathers about guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #73 |
94. Jefferson even recommended carrying a gun any time you were on a walk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
161. How about quoting some of it -- and let's also note populations/society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
78. The militia clause burns in your mind. Like a vacuum tube. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 07:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
119. The constitution delineates the limits on the feds, not the powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #119 |
163. In this case, the big clue is what was put in . . . "A well-regulated militia . . ." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #163 |
169. Then riddle me this Joker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #169 |
190. Why did the gang of 5 put W in the Oval Office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #190 |
197. Niiiiice footwork in avoiding my ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #197 |
202. Guns make no sense for society -- any society -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:23 PM Response to Reply #202 |
206. John Paul Stevens? "The Liberal Lion"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 06:27 AM Response to Reply #206 |
209. One of the biggest things that bothers me about DU, at least in this forum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 12:35 PM Response to Reply #209 |
213. Good point --- the guilt by association tactic seems to be the latest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #202 |
207. Yes he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #207 |
211. Again . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #211 |
214. About 10 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #214 |
218. Imagine that the government is engaging in more intensive training in response now ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 06:22 AM Response to Reply #202 |
208. The federal and state governments are corporations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 06:31 AM Response to Reply #163 |
210. That is not operative language. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
37. Deleted message |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
77. And you're for D.C. representation only if they have gun-prohibition? Got it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. I like Rachel but she is horribly misinformed, prejudiced and WRONG on this particular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. This is the only issue where Democrats talk like Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Absolutely. I learned well over 50 years ago it's tough enough to fight your enemies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
80. Boy, I'll say. This is the only forum where you can regularly get away with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #80 |
103. Aint it cool ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
166. That's because Democratic Party has been infiltrated by GOP/NRA . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
165. Rachel is terrific on every issue including this one -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
171. I agree strongly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Now, who's got it backwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I notice your sig quotes Gandhi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. C'mon. Puke up the standard RW propaganda about how Gandhi *JUST LOVED* his guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeloo
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Cool if you cannot debate,pull out the Nazi card.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Despite your ill-aimed vitriol, Gandhi's quote is apropos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. And this NRA-backed RW amendment would take away DCs right to self-determination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Like Roe v Wade took away the "right" of states to ban abortion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #52 |
122. GOP/NRA/"pro-life miitants" .... all one . . .? Is that what you're saying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #122 |
134. Yep. Both groups of people unwilling to accede to the rule of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #38 |
74. The amendment had, as its purpose, the restore another set of rights to DC.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #38 |
82. Would you support D.C. self-determination if its gun laws were like those of Vermont's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
89. DC has no right to self-determine to deprive residents of their rights to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #89 |
167. Because they don't any longer need "A well-regulated militia" . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #167 |
212. It isn't the "well regulated militia" that has the right to keep and bear arms-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
123. Obviously, the GOP/NRA are running government . . . and Dem decisions now ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #123 |
137. It's unpossible for 'real' Democrats to support the Second Amendment, iow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #137 |
150. Maybe you can work on that with an interpreter and get back to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #150 |
164. Maybe you can stop (cheaply) ducking the point? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #164 |
168. When you explain what you wrote, maybe we can figure out the "point" ...??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #168 |
177. Well.........I didn't write the sentence........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #177 |
189. Yes, a distorted grammar lesson is debate . . . right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:06 PM Response to Reply #189 |
193. "Yes, a distorted grammar lesson is debate......right?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #193 |
195. Again, I'm waiting for an interpretation of the original post you're defending ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #195 |
215. You claim the NRA 'infiltrated' the Democratic Party -without providing evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 11:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
61. Close but not quite a Godwin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:58 AM Response to Reply #21 |
71. I don't think there is any such propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
151. You missed the violence? It was on the anti-civil rights/anti-independence side!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. Seems to me the people of Nebraska freely chose to ban abortions, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
59. You have it backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
72. The people of DC are still perfectly free to ban guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
75. So the yahoos want blacks to be able to own guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dashrif
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #75 |
85. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #85 |
125. No . . . it smacks of GOP/NRA determination to create a violent America and sell guns --!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #125 |
131. You do realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #131 |
170. As far as I'm aware, the majority of Americans want "gun control" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #170 |
176. HaHaHa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #176 |
182. They wouldn't be GOP/NRA statistics by any chance, would they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #182 |
198. Someone please repost this link to deflectandproject? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #198 |
200. It's no use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #200 |
204. Nah . . . they're just nice guys . . . !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #170 |
194. "As far as you are aware".. and you 'ignore' anyone who challenges your preconceived notions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #125 |
136. If that's so, why have crime and murder rates DECLINED nationwide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #136 |
172. Deleted message |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #172 |
181. Thats not what they said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:56 PM Response to Reply #181 |
185. Here's what the poster said . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #185 |
203. Thats right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #12 |
79. You can't ban rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #79 |
126. Deleted message |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
81. Sorry, wrong again. It was the Supreme Court of the U.S.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
95. I wonder if you have an opinion of how same-sex marriage in DC would fare left to a popular vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
124. Great Ghandi quotes . . . !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. California had almost no gun control laws until the Panthers started carrying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Perfectly okay, however, to keep representation from black people! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #20 |
129. Notice it suits the needs of the GOPs/NRA . . . that's how it works.. and these militias ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
128. . . . and don't forget they want "revenge" for slavery . . . !!! That one always sells big!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Governor Ronald Reagan signed the Mulford act into law in 1967. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
127. Absolutely . . . as though we'll tolerate "black" militias . . !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #127 |
135. I see the Deacons for Defense and Justice and Rob Williams do not exist in this dojo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #135 |
219. Harriet Tubman actually used the gun at times to threaten slaves who became frightened .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #219 |
223. Here's a black militia, supported by the NRA. A little more inconvenient truth: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #223 |
224. "A" black militia supported by NRA? SPL reported 360+ new militias in just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeloo
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. As able to defend themselves from criminals? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 12:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
64. Shhh. Antis hate being faced with the racist roots of gun control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. I see the requisite defense of the NRA and the Roberts court is right on time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Deleted message |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. The wingers and fundies feel the same way about Roe v Wade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #48 |
130. Close connections of all to GOP -- NRA/"pro-life" militia/murderers --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. Tossing off criminal accusations pretty lightly, aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #133 |
173. Check with Southern Poverty Law ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #130 |
138. "Pro-life" and gun control advocates are the same: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:40 PM Original message |
Presume you think that post makes sense . . . check with someone on your side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #138 |
179. Gun control advocates are similar to Repubs vis-a-vis the health care issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 10:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
220. Right . . . the GOP/NRA love the Roberts Court -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PinkFloyd
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. They did it because they knew most likely it would be a Democratic seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. The bill also added a seat in Utah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. Norton should have actually read the amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Sorry to say Norton is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Deleted message |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. When did the NRA become part of congress where they could submit and vote for amendments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Since forever. They wrote the amendment that lost a 90%+ Democratic city, a vote. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
51. SO really some congress critter submitted an admendment and others voted to attach it to a bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 11:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
62. Were they really going to get a vote? I doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:25 AM Response to Reply #39 |
70. No; the Constitution did that a long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tippy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Remember this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Kicking this just for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
54. What does that have to do with congress, or this bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
145. Wow -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #145 |
157. How the hell do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #157 |
175. Am I the one pushing guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #175 |
183. Strawman # 234,609,762,628 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #183 |
187. We are discussing the GOP/NRA . . . and the amendment which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #175 |
184. Now your flat out lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #184 |
186. GOP/NRA and their members don't want to spread guns around? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:20 PM Response to Reply #186 |
205. No we dont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
84. Remember this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dashrif
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. +1000 A pro 2nd candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #88 |
112. Yep. Gun-owners are a significant bloc. Are they tens-of-millions? Probably not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tippy
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #84 |
91. NRA lost Dems a lot of votes over the years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #91 |
113. I agree with the craziness of it all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #91 |
146. And the reality of who tooks away the guns in Katrina was . . . ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
143. Amazing . . . also reminds me of the Diebold/? computer guy bragging he'd be working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. They paid good money for a couple dozen GOP members of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:53 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. O noes, it's the Protocols of the Elders of The NRA Redux! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. So, lobbying about gun laws is the same as antisemitic blood libel? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:36 AM Response to Reply #56 |
66. Yes, they are both moral panics ginned up to con the gullible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:10 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Ding ding ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:28 PM Response to Reply #66 |
147. Deleted message |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. oh, which ones and how much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
144. Right . . . and when those members finally wake up the right wing agenda will be in place!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
142. NRA is a corporation "paying to play" and our elected officials are bribed . . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
42. Love ya, Rachel.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
57. The bill would have been ruled unconstitutional anyways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. I entirely agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:11 AM Response to Reply #57 |
69. DC had representatives from 1800 to 1810 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #69 |
148. Interesting . . . thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
58. I thought it was an ingenious way to blame the NRA for something that was dubious to begin with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
63. "With their poison pill amendment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
83. What is wrong with gun fanatics trying to force cities to arm their populations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Wow, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Total selfishness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
99. What's an extreme assault weapon? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
east texas lib
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. They have built in I-Pods that play death-metal tracks as you spray hot flaming lead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Duuuuuude! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #99 |
110. The "shoulder thing that goes up" has sharp pointy things on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Maybe this is one of them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. Nope, that's not it - besides everyone knows that assault weapons are black... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #87 |
101. Are you animist? Do you believe that *seeing* someone carrying a gun is harmful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #87 |
141. By the time the members wake up that they're supporting right wing agenda -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #83 |
92. I can and do own firearms and have a concealed weapons permit ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
100. Cite, please? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 07:02 PM Response to Reply #83 |
102. The "arm everyone" canard AGAIN? It's like chupacabras or Bigfoot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #83 |
140. Yep -- hard to explain why anyone would be opposed -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackson1999
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
90. As probably the only DC resident in the Gungeon..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:33 PM Response to Reply #90 |
149. My guess: GOP/NRA are right wing . . . DC is minority occupied . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
96. Can't be honest for a second, can you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
97. My take on why denying DC residents their rights is a really bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
104. Just out of curiosity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 10:41 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Definition of "assault weapon" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 12:16 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. So... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. True, and the term is often used to confuse people ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
106. Thanks for posting. OP is an opportunity for some who oppose RKBA to demonstrate gross ignorance. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #106 |
116. The sad refrain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Ignorance is a curable disease, stupidity is a terminal illness. Those who refuse to accept they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
118. If they want to let people carry something that doesn't exist and nobody can define... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
121. Heard DC representation was coming up again . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #121 |
132. You do know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #132 |
139. No . . . it's the GOP's NRA from the beginning . .. that they have infiltrated the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #139 |
152. They were even smart enough to steal *all* the evidence of this that you had... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #152 |
178. You mean you didn't know that GOP/NRA were targeting "gun control" Dems . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #139 |
159. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #159 |
180. How did it benefit you that the GOP/NRA infiltrated Dem Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #139 |
174. Wow is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #174 |
188. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #139 |
192. When I got back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #139 |
216. Like Ahab and the whale, you are. You don't care if your pursuit sinks the ship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #216 |
217. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
221. Looks like the "GOP/NRA" have been using alien technology they got via Eisenhower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 01:46 AM Response to Reply #221 |
222. Thanks for the huge laugh, friendly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC