Why doesn't Bloomberg release his unedited videos? Sleazy James O'Keefe did.

[friendly_iconoclast]

I guess there are things on those tapes that us proles shouldn't be looking at. Mustn't ask too many questions, and all that...

[HankyDubs]

1. i wonder

if there's anything that changes the fact that the seller was told...point blank: "I probably couldn't pass a background check."

Still, I agree, an unedited video should be released--if only to silence the bunker-dwellers.

[sharesunited]

2. I'm on your side Dubs. But that seller was obviously hard of hearing.

I wanted him to acknowledge with a wink and a nod. It wasn't there.

[HankyDubs]

4. believe me

I pay attention and know the handles that the sane people in here use. There are so few of us who actually enter the gungeon.

Why do you think the seller was hard of hearing? Does the abscence of a "wink and nod" prove that he heard every other statement made by the buyer...but somehow not the critical admission?

[sharesunited]

6. Look at that clip again. He battles to communicate past his own hearing loss and room noise.

If he had just said No Problem or the like.

Good effort by NYC though, and I do welcome further attempts to nail these dangerous bastards.

[safeinOhio]

3. It's a fact

voluntary compliance does not work when there is a buck to be made.

[HankyDubs]

5. yup

voluntary compliance is clearly not getting the job done here.