|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 01:44 PM Original message |
TEXAS: House backs bill to allow guns in cars at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Conservatives are AWESOME! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. usual texas has thier priorities straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Rep. Tim Kleinschmidt, R-Lexington - more GOP/NRA bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Nope, for once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Republican gun laws suck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. yup, the hell with private property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. I feel that the contents of one's car is private property of the owner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Agreed. 100% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #25 |
51. I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Yeah, the hell with private property, I'll just turn over the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. mmmm .. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. If enough of us do that, then we can vote in a gun-friendly government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:34 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Sure is some nice hunting and fishing up there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 06:38 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 06:37 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 07:59 AM Response to Reply #43 |
49. What imperialism? We would become Canadian citizens and vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Gosh, everyone just sucks in your narrow little world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northoftheborder
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Actually, I think this was a compromise with those who wanted.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
5. Another win for gun owners who have a concealed weapons permit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #5 |
37. It's not a bad change but I don't understand the exemption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. An employer can't stop you from keeping porn in your car. They shouldn't be able to ban guns either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. An employer con fire you for any reason in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. How are they going to know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Open your trunk for the drug & alcohol sweep or your fired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. So you're going to search EVERY car, EVERY day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. If they don't like it - too bad, find another place to work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yeah, screw workers' rights! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Screw property rights, the and the right of employers to run their businesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:19 AM Response to Reply #16 |
39. There in lies the rub. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #39 |
48. you say no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
53. Do try to stay in touch with reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. workers' rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Workers rights are about to take a step forward in Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 06:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
45. this is too sad to be funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. note |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 08:17 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. It may be a different step forward than the step that you want... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. yes, it's just a matter of preference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. "if your workers don't like it, they can find another job" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:11 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. "it doesn't get much more right-wing than "if your workers don't like it, they can find another job" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. I would oppose searches like that as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Pimping the war on drugs now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 11:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. Employers don't do that. Instead they send employees to have a pee test. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. "law-abiding gun owners" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ManiacJoe
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Gun owners do think about that problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Quelle surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. yes, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DWC
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. "So Texas will be a bit lower in next year's Brady rating" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #14 |
40. Damn skippy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Thu May-05-11 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Good. I'm more motivated to get my CCW now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. I keep my CHL just for the simple fact that it exempts me from the NICS check. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 06:42 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. omg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. soon Texas will go constitutional carry and we'll drop the need for CHL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-06-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. That is one of several reasons I got my Curio and Relic FFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC