|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
jpak
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:04 AM Original message |
Judiciary Republicans kill bill blocking gun sales to suspected terrorists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. McVeigh was a registered Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
104. Paul Helmke is also a registered Republican so what's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newfie11
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. With legislators like these who needs terrorists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. If you're talking about Quigley... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. So what makes Quigley any different from the Republicans?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. What??!!! We have a "No Fly" list, possibly a "No Ride" list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Indeed it is fucked up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. How nice the republicans want to start observing "civil liberties" with gun sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. I've been against all of those things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. If the Republicans and their Democratic enablers take strides to restrict civil liberties... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. And please point to where I claimed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. The Republicans should want to vote for this bill! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Nobody who gives a damn about civil liberties.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. And if you don't understand my outrage at the inconsistency of Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. I have plenty of similar outrage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Nice post. Let's stop infringing on everyone's "civil" liberties and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Strawman again? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:01 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Big time. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
32. What strawman. The "Civil Liberties" reference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
56. Oh come on. Seriously, do you need coffee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
discntnt_irny_srcsm
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
112. Skip the coffee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
106. cool do I get my choice when I land or just what the airline hands out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
discntnt_irny_srcsm
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. If I get upgraded to 1st class... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #111 |
119. Hi-Points for coach.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
discntnt_irny_srcsm
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. I can always use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:59 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. I love my hi-poin 9mm carbine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Loving Wife likes hers also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Haha, I have a BSA red dot on mine as well!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:18 AM Response to Reply #124 |
127. I just bought a used one from a co-worker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Nice!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #129 |
134. $1K for all three. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #134 |
135. No, I'd say that was a pretty fail deal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. I also promised to sell the Colt back to him at cost if he ever comes back. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #136 |
141. Lol, I just realized that my title said "fail deal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 02:45 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. Heh, I missed that completely. Good catch... 8>) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I'm with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Nice emotional rant - but utterly irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:33 AM Response to Reply #19 |
35. You're partially correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
61. Quigley doesn't understand the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #35 |
63. "Private Dealer" is an oxymoron - there is no such creature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
139. many of those things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
7. Apparently the GOP's interpretation of 2A trumps everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. I seem to remember reading something about "Due Process" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Don't forget KansDem, onehandle, and Starbord Tack in there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. your guns are not a priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I hope you have a permission slip for your hobby of posting rancid crap on the internet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
41. this hobby doesn't get people killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
79. Id say hateful words have killed more people than guns ever will NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #41 |
130. so blaming us for gang violence so you can light your bong with a clear conscience? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Lol, the constitution has been on my side... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #26 |
43. Well regulated militia.... twist away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #43 |
52. It's very simple actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:01 AM Original message |
sure... that's what it means...lolololo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
59. You can search for and verify the quotes they use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
68. Well, Obama, SCOTUS and the Congress all said so too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. I'm taking Obama's word for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
99. Just another NRA/GOP/Moran I bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
80. Does the second amendment say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Do you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #28 |
46. so far yes... my brain, arms, hands, legs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #46 |
54. "Nothing ever happend to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. lol... pathetic. SO you live in fear of something POSSIBLY happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. Oh really? I'm paranoid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #58 |
108. None of those messy seat belts or smoke detectors either I bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
116. Yet, If you had your way, you'd regulate the hell out of guns,due to something POSSIBLY happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3holies
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
120. There is not a way to accurately describe that post without violating a sackful of DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
discntnt_irny_srcsm
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
123. Just because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. Um, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. no.... I don't actually... people have a right to buy aq gun for their homes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. The watch list is reprehensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Did you think these lists were a good idea all along, or only when they added guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #76 |
90. neither... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:33 PM Response to Reply #65 |
100. Because, fot the most part, the people on those lists AREN"T FUCKING TERRORISTS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
39. For not being a priority there sure are a lot of pro-gun bills getting passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #15 |
44. Here's a tissue, you got a little fleck of spittle there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. seems you need to use that tissue for your eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #48 |
71. Read the link I posted.. save some electrons posting it here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
91. Asked and answered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
82. My guns ARE a priority to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
115. Uh huh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
128. no more like 40 percent population grass roots vs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Please enlighten us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:13 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:18 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It's funny... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Yeah, I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #37 |
53. If you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #53 |
73. What due process is involved here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Such as swearing out a warrant for arrest or search.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Please cite the civil right that guarantees the right to purchase anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Common law- right to enter into contracts (including purchases) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:06 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. So it's about the Feds issuing a license to a suspected terrorist? Not about sales? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. From your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. You asked about the 'right to purchase' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. I think XDigger sai it better than I ever could. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. Maybe, but I still don't buy the civil rights violation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Let's go over that list.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Well, this is a list of suspects. Are their rights being infringed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Suspects still have rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #92 |
101. Well, it's about a federally approved sale, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #101 |
109. Sorry, I don't know what you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #109 |
143. I agree about the lists. The rest is open to interpretation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #143 |
146. What is "the rest"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. Yes we agree the lists are abusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 02:47 AM Response to Reply #147 |
150. Good, I'm glad we can agree on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Now we're getting somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #151 |
152. Maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #152 |
153. Having a cellphone turned on in many situations is irresposible, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #153 |
154. They are asking owners to not use phones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. Why would someone have a cellphone in a car... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #155 |
156. Cellphones are communication devices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #156 |
157. Lethal to who? That's how it works. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #157 |
160. Lethal by design |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:20 AM Response to Reply #160 |
162. Can you discern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #162 |
164. Absolutely. We all know each bullet has a name on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:14 AM Response to Reply #164 |
165. Whose name is it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 02:31 PM Response to Reply #156 |
159. Regardless of what they're designed for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:19 AM Response to Reply #159 |
161. Using a gun for it's intended purpose will, not may, cause injury or death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #161 |
163. Its hard to make a phone call with a gun. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:13 AM Response to Reply #161 |
166. Wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Gosh you're selfish... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #94 |
103. OK I'm down with that. Now where do we go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #103 |
113. Follow the money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #113 |
144. Ok, but I'm not seeing a money angle, just political capital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Is there a difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #145 |
148. You compare campaign contributions to non profits with the corporate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #148 |
149. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #89 |
97. Yes, the zombie from NJ would like to prevent them from exercising their rights protected by the 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #97 |
105. Yes, of course I understand all that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. This isn't about a license or a permit.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. I don't think you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3holies
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #89 |
121. Every inmate at Gitmo is a 'suspect' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:34 AM Response to Reply #89 |
133. Not a list of suspects, certainly not suspects in the usual sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Not just yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
88. Also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
50. BAM, BAM, BAM.... nail meet hammer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biermeister
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
47. 10000% agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
14. Amazing that anyone would try to defend this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. What? Due process? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marengo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Your user name is rather ironic N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:56 AM Response to Reply #22 |
51. oh, your fetuish for a gun makes your reply even more ironic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. lol, what a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:05 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Dude... use your own mind and words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Yes, because my own mind and words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marengo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #51 |
98. Ah, an incompetent mentalist I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gejohnston
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:27 AM Response to Reply #51 |
131. actually yours is based on lies and unless you seriously know the history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #14 |
72. Amazing that someone with your username would support police state mentality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. The terrorist watch list is bullshit. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
17. Tell us about the other Bush/Cheney policies you support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
33. No one has ever been clear with the types of people on the llist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
38. The terrorist watch list is crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
42. So if you're a suspected "terrorist", you can buy a weapon but you can't board a plane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #42 |
57. Do you even know why people get placed on the list at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #57 |
67. Agree with all you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Gotcha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #57 |
96. Or the have a common name that has been used by a suspected terrorist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
102. Breaking news: constitutional rights cannot be denied to American citizens with out trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
114. If they pass this and restrict other rights like voting. Should terrorists vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
discntnt_irny_srcsm
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. Just remember... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
117. "Judiciary Republicans kill bill that would have stopped Ted Kennedy from buying a gun" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
132. Unrec for blatantly inaccurate title and message body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lost_in_nv
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
137. Why would any progressive be in favor of this bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
138. Calling citizens on the watchlists "known or suspected terrorists" is a Bushism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
140. It's not "restricting certain civil liberties", it's denying them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Wed May-18-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
158. Looks like the broken clock is right again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC