|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Fri May-30-08 10:17 PM Original message |
Naudet's 9/11 Plane Shot Staged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Fri May-30-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. thanks SLaD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. That article was written by someone needing serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 08:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. One minor point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. No way the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That may be your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. You are so condescending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You're the one posting garbage from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. You post nothing but garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Just stand behind your posts, SLAD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Stand behind this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. The author of the OP thinks so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Deleted message |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I was just giving you an easy out - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Deleted sub-thread |
RedSock
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. actually, there is another film of the first crash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. They are NOT my facts and please produce a link to back up YOUR fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. here you go - LINK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Unless SLAD is Leslie Raphael or Drew Terry, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Deleted message |
greyl
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Is it possible for you to stick to discussing the subject of your own OP? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. not with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I suspect you don't take your own posts seriously. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sun Sep-28-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
65. how come it's been removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Nov-03-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
69. This video has been removed by the user. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Good find... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sat May-31-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. The Naudet film was shown on TV shortly after 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-01-08 05:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. The smallest 767 and the largest DC9 are the same length |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sun Jun-01-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. totally gray? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Was it a close up or a distant shot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 07:27 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Also, United was a greyish blue - especially compared to that sky. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I haven't seen this shot since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. So the plotters forgot to paint the plane the right color? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. well I wasn't there but a neighbor of ours was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. Is this the shot we are discussing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
31. So, we're all in agreement that the OP is wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. It is definitely wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Mon Jun-02-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Yep, everyone who is honest about it agrees. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leslie raphael
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
37. naudet film and lared response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 06:23 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. So seven years later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 06:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I was in lower Manhattan that day and it makes perfect sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieW
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. You're being too logical HamdenRice, LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Mon Dec-29-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #39 |
87. I was at Chambers and Broadway when the plane hit the North Tower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. You heard the plane ...but did you see it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Here you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Thanks...I don't want to sound pedantic...did you actually see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Clear view of the North Tower from where I was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. thanks 4 responding again...so i guess your vantage point was similar to this?: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Tue Dec-30-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. "anything more sensible to offer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. A few comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Wed Nov-19-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
72. Zzzzzz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RadioFlyer
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #72 |
80. Good explanation of video work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Sep-23-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. That very much appears to be the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
victordrazen
![]() |
Tue Sep-23-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. it's funny how the only convincing plane footage came out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Sep-23-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Yes, odd isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Sep-23-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. And somebody else just nuked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I just posted to Skinner about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. What do you think is going on? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I don't think, I KNOW and so do you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I can only guess, you think people that have a different opinion of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. No you can only guess wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. It's not clear how you know this is happening, plus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. It is not opinion it is sabotage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. I doubt there is a strong relationship between views and rating at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Try not to take it personally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Not all conspiracy theories equal then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Thu Sep-25-08 01:08 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. No, I think they cover a spectrum like most everything else in the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Trust me it is unlikely that it's the poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Do you take MIHOP seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Sep-25-08 05:00 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Do I take MIHOP seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Sep-25-08 05:46 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Deleted sub-thread |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. me too! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Sep-24-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
59. I remember Ray Ubinger writing about this here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Oct-14-08 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
66. Naudet's film is too pat a fix . . . otherwise, they would have had only the poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Wed Nov-19-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. His footage looks fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #66 |
81. They need a clear view of a "plane" to divert attention from explosions -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Oct-14-08 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
67. Agree --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Nov-03-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
68. k&r -- snd agree ... questionable --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
torgos_pizza
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
70. Why not admit all the footage of the planes crashing were fakes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #70 |
82. I'm with the "Truther" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penttbom
![]() |
Fri Nov-07-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
71. new WTC impact footage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leslie raphael
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
74. Naudet Film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. To Leslie: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Thu Nov-27-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Did you not read the replies upthread?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #76 |
83. Naudet's film is only one which clearly establishes a "plane" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Nov-28-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Sad and pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bulldawg6
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
85. Still Conjecture At Best... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
victordrazen
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
78. Whatever happened to the Fraudet's anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat Nov-29-08 03:04 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. What's your address? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. Interesting info --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. "Fraudet's"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC