|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
killtown
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:14 PM Original message |
Snopes.com's Hilarious Pentagon Debunk Attempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Snopes may or may not have gotten the lawn impact correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Sun Dec-04-05 10:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. May or may not gotten it right??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. One photo cannot establish if it happened or not but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 09:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. So What?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 08:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Nope (though they may be)-- mostly it points to the inaccuracy of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 04:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Snopes............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Snopes getting this point wrong means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 07:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
24. Apparently Snopes got this one right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. LoL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. No, I don't think that is accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I'm glad we agree on that point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry_s
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Those Incredible Cable Spools... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. It hit the ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb
![]() |
Mon Dec-05-05 10:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. What is the basis for your conclusion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 03:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. ASCE report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 08:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. oh yeah, I believe that. The generator was able to deflect the plane's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 08:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. You seem to be referring to a photo, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. So Where Did the Parts of the Plane Go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Where most things go traveling a few hundred miles per hour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Bullshit - the wing would have been sheared off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 01:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. 3 rings of reinforced concrete? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The Pentagon is Constructed of Reinforced Concrete In Concentric Rings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-05 03:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Gereat buildings says the Pentagon has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 08:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Even if the wings did shear off, they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I'm still waiting for someone to show me a pic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Jan-25-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. The tips did shear off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Jan-27-06 06:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. "The Hijacker's ID would have been in the cockpit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Did it also shrink - or vaporize when it went "in the Pentagon"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Jan-25-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Oh gee a new website! Never seen that one before! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiggles85
![]() |
Wed Jan-25-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. A good deal was inside the pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1
![]() |
Thu Jan-26-06 07:44 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. How can you have a jet inside....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 04:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Where did the left engine "strike the ground"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-06-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. So Snopes was wrong when they said the 757's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Jan-25-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. You're making the accusation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Jan-27-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Oh they got a lot wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Jan-24-06 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
29. Come on Sabbat Hunter, I'm calling you out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Jan-27-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Come on Sabbat, why ya ducking this??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Wow, that was pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. i agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 02:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. So you admit that Snopes' theory is FLAWED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Fri Feb-03-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I bet you would like people who expose Snopes' bad work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenman2
![]() |
Sat Feb-11-06 03:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. i have a response to snopes as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton
![]() |
Sat Feb-11-06 04:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 05:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC