|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
reprehensor
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 10:12 AM Original message |
The Demolition of the World Trade Center Towers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. My favorite part is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 11:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's not bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. perfectly accurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Perfectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. How many explosives did this take? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes, that's the building I mentioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 02:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. How are you defining "partial" collapse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 03:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Glad you asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. apparently intact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Hard to say from this photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 05:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. On what then are you basing your claim? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. The available evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 05:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. One picture is the available evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I don't see any other pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Perhaps you would find some if you bothered to look. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 08:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. No need, as there are no useful parallels. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 01:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. So then you brought it up for no reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Notice the use of parentheses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Okay, I won't thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 11:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. And I won't answer your rhetorical question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Tue Dec-27-05 04:41 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. I'll take that as a YES. ( n/t ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Dec-27-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. YES, my original statements are accurate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Perhaps this may be of some help: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Thanks, and if it relieves the itching, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:24 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. If your original statement was accurate, why are you changing it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:38 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. To ease your symptoms. No charge. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 11:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. What are the real facts of all those "errors"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 02:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It was hard to find this information, but I finally tracked it down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewJohnson
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. How significant are the errors, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncrainbowgrrl
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Hi AndrewJohnson! Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 05:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Hello Andrew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat
![]() |
Sun Dec-25-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. No conservation of momentum in those graphs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewJohnson
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 05:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
57. Wow! So Ike is warning not just of the MIC, but the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sat Dec-24-05 06:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I think some of them are significant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 09:00 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Don't worry, there aren't any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. You don't think the full height of the building should be used... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. He's using the full height. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Which one is the full height? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 11:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. 1350' is the full height |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Tue Dec-27-05 05:09 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. But not the full height of the building. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Dec-27-05 12:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. It's the full height of the buildings, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 10:54 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Perhaps your understanding of dynamic structural loads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 11:58 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I already danced a Dynamic Duet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Thank God for Diphenhydramine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Thu Dec-29-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Try not to scratch when you hear this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 09:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. The errors make the whole argument null and void |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewJohnson
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Stopwatch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Dec-26-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. I have numerous videos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rich Hunt
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. A good resource... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 03:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. thanks Rich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rich Hunt
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. that wasn't the point, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Yes Rich, I do think that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. more or less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 04:18 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Both, which is why it's deceptive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Even though it was never claimed to be a model of any part of the WTC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. you were only off by 625%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 08:42 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. That's mighty impressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. No need to apologize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I was not apologizing to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeedBug
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. My Story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Dec-23-05 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
15. Afaik the claim of the Official Story is not that the steel beams melted, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC