|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:25 AM Original message |
| Braun hired by Dean for $20K |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BurtWorm
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Good for her. It's nice when Dems help Dems! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Anything I can do |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kool Kitty
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 127. Good for both of them. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. I predicted this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cassandra
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Since you didn't read this in the previous thread, I'll repost it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 20. There was something funky about the union endorsement too, if I remember |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cassandra
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 39. I would be surprised if every member of any local... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:46 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 46. It was the head of the local who was pissed, and it was because... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #46 |
| 47. Link to first thread with bad title, but many good arguments: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lurk_no_more
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 51. I talked to some AFSME members that said that very thing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:51 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 54. Thanks for the confirmation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Eloriel
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 78. But the reality is -- just in case anyone actually cares about that -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:20 AM Response to Reply #78 |
| 92. I think the point is there at least two anecdotes of locals being mad that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justice
|
Sat Jan-17-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #78 |
| 136. I thought AFSCME was different than other unions |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 34. I actully read it and tried to respond. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cassandra
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:49 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 50. Thank you for trying |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| srpantalonas
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 12. stop saying Dean is corrupt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 22. I never said Dean was corrupt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NWHarkness
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 42. Your implication was obvious |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:56 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 61. impllication: desperation. Not corruption. Desperation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Eloriel
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 94. Throughout the whole debate "season," at every opportunity CMB |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:42 AM Response to Reply #94 |
| 102. First time she ever told a lie was when she said "John" voted with Bush .. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:02 AM Response to Reply #94 |
| 139. El. i agree with you in part. she was a peacemaker in the begining |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 137. that's a problem for me but also the fact that this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 23. Legitimate, but her endorsemetn loses credibility. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Mon Jan-19-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 150. it's been two days and i'm still steamed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 41. Deleted message |
| lurk_no_more
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 36. OMG you were right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Duder
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Good hire |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark Can WIN
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 105. I believe that the disclocusre of the Dean campains payment to Ms. Braun |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bitchkitty
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #105 |
| 129. She got $20K from Dean - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| beaconess
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:31 AM Response to Reply #129 |
| 132. I don't know - why don't you tell us? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark Can WIN
|
Mon Jan-19-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #129 |
| 152. Clark is not at the sad end of a bankrupt campaign and desperate for cash |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Deleted message |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. I'll hire you, don't pay much though. But it's a job. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:33 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. $20K in under 2 months? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Duder
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 28. She might have made more |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:42 AM Response to Reply #28 |
| 40. Unfortunately |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Duder
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:52 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 55. Too bad she doesn't have the 'right' qualifications or |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:51 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 53. That's not my 2008 offer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RetroLounge
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Yawn |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wtmusic
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. Good move |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. She was a hired gun at the debate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 33. Proof? The story doesn't say that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 43. The proof would be in her demeanor & context. Dean didn't want to be mean |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark Can WIN
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:06 AM Response to Reply #43 |
| 74. I was very sad to see this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Leilani
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:15 AM Response to Reply #74 |
| 84. I wasn't sad & I was not surprised |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:06 AM Response to Reply #43 |
| 75. Then she must have been hired 3 months ago when she first defended Dean |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 45. She was talking to the Dean campaign a week ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KaraokeKarlton
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:30 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 131. Are you saying that CMB shouldn't have been able to talk? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #131 |
| 140. i'll say it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #140 |
| 145. Yes. If she knew she wasn't running for herself, why's she there? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| drfemoe
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 86. cbs spins chicago sun |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| angee_is_mad
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 35. what votes? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Well... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 16. At least you are consistent. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:37 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 25. I'll be there within the hour! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 49. Congrats on 1000!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #49 |
| 52. Merci! To peace on DU! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deminflorida
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. In South Carolina, Ambassador Braun must compete with.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hellhathnofury
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 31. Carter of Clinton? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. They were in TALKS when CMB was Dean's attack dog in the debate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| windansea
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:37 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 24. obviously n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:38 AM Original message |
| "Did I pass the interview?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:03 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 72. Proof? You are WRONG. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #72 |
| 85. Her demeanor changed dramatically. Was she trying to show Dean what she |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Leilani
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:23 AM Response to Reply #72 |
| 95. "negotiated her departure" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cassandra
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:15 AM Response to Reply #95 |
| 130. The smart ones |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lobo_13
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. Less inflammatory title |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| angee_is_mad
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. well she got what she wanted |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tatiana
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:53 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 110. Did we call it, or what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JNelson6563
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Delightful news! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Those debate attacks MAKE SENSE NOW |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:39 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 30. She has defended Dean before and tried to re-focus the efforts on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 37. Question is, did she believe what she was saying? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 48. looks like it didn't matter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 56. Oh no, I'm sure she is a corrupt bitch who did it for the money. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:53 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 57. Again, how many on that list spent two weeks pretending they were running |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mzmolly
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Reply #57 |
| 66. NO ONE spent TWO weeks pretending they were running for President |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:02 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 70. sshh! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 80. I'm counting back to when her demeanor change dramatically. Who wasn't... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:14 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 81. Without regard for "anything"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:54 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 58. I see some cock roaches on that list |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:01 AM Response to Reply #58 |
| 69. Technically, CMB is a cockroach too -- she was a Dem senator who couldn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lobo_13
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:19 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 91. You forgot those evil bastards |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 32. yes. they were unprincipled. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stickdog
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:47 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 107. How does this news make sense of Sharpton's low blow? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| beaconess
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #107 |
| 134. So, let me get this straight |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #134 |
| 147. Right on! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark Can WIN
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. I would seriously question the endorsement of a PAID |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| funky_bug
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 125. I wouldn't worry about it getting buried |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LuminousX
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 138. You are right, all Dean endorsements should be nullified as suspicious |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #138 |
| 148. With stories like this, they will be. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Karmadillo
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. This looks terrible. While the likes of Zell Miller |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| oasis
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 117. Who do you think bought in bulk those stupid books of Zell's? GOPeee. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MoonRiver
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. Well, it looks like politics as usual. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. couldn't they have waited a week? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| candy331
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Reply #38 |
| 65. Might be some real compassionate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rose Siding
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 44. That seems fair |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 59. Bleachers, we're so happy that you are a DU supporter. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:59 AM Response to Reply #59 |
| 62. Blame CBS, Dean, Braun |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Reply #62 |
| 64. Oh yes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 60. Deleted message |
| Clark4VotingRights
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 63. Is that typical for those giving endorsements to get a salary? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #63 |
| 77. In all fairness, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| beaconess
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:31 AM Response to Reply #77 |
| 98. Kweisi Mfume has NOT endorsed Kerry and certainly isn't paid by Kerry |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:35 AM Response to Reply #98 |
| 99. Hmm. I'd love to get a second look at that article in The Hill. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| beaconess
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:41 AM Response to Reply #99 |
| 101. I don't think it was a smear. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark4VotingRights
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:37 AM Response to Reply #98 |
| 100. Good catch beaconess. Remember when Trent Lott threatened |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 67. She was already talking to Dean about $ when she was being his attack dog? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| drfemoe
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
| 88. not according to the source story |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #88 |
| 141. there were contact prior to this. the other article said it started |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemBones DemBones
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 68. Money or no money, I've lost most of my respect |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark4VotingRights
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #68 |
| 87. Ya know, Jon Stewart even complained about that the next day |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pax Argent
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:19 AM Response to Reply #68 |
| 90. To me it shows wisdom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
| 71. Deleted message |
| MIMStigator
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:05 AM Response to Reply #71 |
| 73. pretty soon the anti Dean folks will be putting out negative flyers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jerseycoa
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 76. You sure called this one, Bleachers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EXE619K
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 79. Could it be possible that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LoZoccolo
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 82. I don't really see what this has to do... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lurk_no_more
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 83. This is really sad |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 89. Seems to me Braun stayed in just long enough |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:23 AM Response to Reply #89 |
| 96. Ouch. Good catch. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:44 AM Response to Reply #96 |
| 103. Yeah - look at the totals from DC: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemBones DemBones
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:57 AM Response to Reply #103 |
| 112. WOW -- Sharpton WOULD have beat Dean in D.C. w/o Braun! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:02 AM Response to Reply #112 |
| 116. Timing is suspicious |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #112 |
| 142. sweet tea...i didn't even think of that... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cryofan
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 93. sharpton & Braun teamed up to attack Dean, thus getting offer from Dean? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:24 AM Response to Reply #93 |
| 97. I think you are flat wrong |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MoonRiver
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:45 AM Response to Reply #93 |
| 104. If that's what happened, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:37 AM Response to Reply #104 |
| 143. me too...plus i sent her money twice |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stickdog
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 106. And how much is Kerry paying Rand Beers? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:48 AM Response to Reply #106 |
| 108. What's a bummer is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemBones DemBones
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:10 AM Response to Reply #106 |
| 119. The difference is that Rand Beers was never a candidate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:39 AM Response to Reply #106 |
| 144. rand beers is running for prez? who knew... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joefree1
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 109. Wow, attacking Carol Moseley Braun, a new low |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TLM
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:59 AM Response to Reply #109 |
| 113. Anybody who supports Dean goes in the meatgrinder... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:59 AM Response to Reply #109 |
| 114. "Take the Men's Only sign off the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TLM
|
Sat Jan-17-04 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 111. WTF... two days ago these same people were attacking Dean |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:00 AM Response to Reply #111 |
| 115. If you read my earlier post |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| oasis
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:07 AM Response to Reply #115 |
| 118. Serious questions are "attacks" only to the party being questioned. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joefree1
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:17 AM Response to Reply #115 |
| 120. thanks for agreeing that "attacks are at CMB" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:24 AM Response to Reply #120 |
| 122. As I said before, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joefree1
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:30 AM Response to Reply #122 |
| 124. Yeah, she thinks Dean is hot stuff |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MontecitoDem
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:35 AM Response to Reply #124 |
| 126. I have a feeling |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joefree1
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #126 |
| 128. See #124 and sure here's some more pictures too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bearfartinthewoods
|
Sat Jan-17-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #124 |
| 146. no, they're on the sucker list, like me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TLM
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:21 AM Response to Reply #115 |
| 121. That is a good point.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| beaconess
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #111 |
| 135. Oh, please |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ACPS65
|
Sat Jan-17-04 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 123. How surprising |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gulliver
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 133. This is corruption and a terrible thing to do. It will hurt Dean ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tim_in_HK
|
Sat Jan-17-04 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 149. It does look a little bad . . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cuban_Liberal
|
Mon Jan-19-04 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 151. Yay! Let's mine the archives for negative stuff! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC