|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:08 AM Original message |
Do we need a new workers' party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. Absolutely not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. the middle class works for a living |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The Queen works for a living |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. do you believe that work is outdated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
41. No she doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. The factory age is not over.......it moved to China and India and Mexico |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Are you speaking for Canada and the United States? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. no, the factories just moved to China |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. Well, what do you call people who work 40+ hr/wk at poverty wages? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. It's not over in China |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
40. Wow. Where to begin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudbluestater
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:20 AM Original message |
The Dems are also abandoning the pro-choice voter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. and you see this where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudbluestater
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 11:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Well, youngred, I see this, praytell, by Kerry and others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveable liberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. all employees should belong to a union...and all unions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:26 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Also outdated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eg101
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 07:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. you do reflect the attitude of the democratic party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Maple is a supporter of free trade, no tarrifs and could really care less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. the idea of "Free Trade" is outdated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 09:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Unions are for people who are exploited by their employers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. do you imagine that business gives you benefits out of the goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. junior sez fast food joints are factories, so how come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
43. Wha...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaska
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
50. Unions are not limited to factory workers. All who work for someone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
42. We need to democratize the unions first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. If we do not have the clout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KT2000
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 03:06 AM Response to Original message |
7. In the meantime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'd vote for a Labor party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:42 AM Response to Original message |
10. Would any workers join such a party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eg101
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 07:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xerenthar
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. Oh no! Capital! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 08:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
37. Oh no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
18. Great idea! Split the workers' vote so that they become irrelevant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. The workers vote is already split between the Dems and the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Not a whole lot you can do with Reagan Democrats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. You know some rare Reagan Democrats...good for you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. There is an awful lot we can do about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. So what? electing Dems is offering less and less return every year, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 08:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. how would it split the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. They're already irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
22. Got one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. they sometimes cross endorse Democrats in New York |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
28. You're right; but of course it would immediately be branded as 'communist' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. so? We brand them right back - they support Commie China, Walmart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sun Dec-26-04 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
33. What we need is new Labor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
39. Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. I should add that there already *is* one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
48. and the message to workers is ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaska
![]() |
Mon Dec-27-04 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
49. Amen, WT2... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC