|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:31 AM Original message |
SIGN THIS PLEASE : The Dems have an actual agenda !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud_Kucitizen
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. The link doesn't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Thanks for catching that --it's fixed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. I hit your link and got an email write but no form |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I think it's fixed -- doc should say "Become a Citizen Sponsor" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. Links still not working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I'm so sorry - link fixed now -- I'm a techno-spaz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud_Kucitizen
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks and it was a pleasure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoMama49
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I signed it too. I told them to PLEASE expose the lies of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbartch
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. I signed it last night and forwarded it to 15 people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conflictgirl
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
9. Thanks for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yeah, I see your point on the miltary posturing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conflictgirl
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I agree too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. sending people into harms way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
56. Well now that * has put us there, we're stuck and we have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. It's more than an agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senaca
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 05:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:31 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. This package is their agenda, they are fighting SS separately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunnystarr
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
44. It's not part of the agenda because Dems don't see SS as a crisis. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
15. it is an agenda, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. What??? Please reconsider! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. I understand what you're saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eg101
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
16. smells like more mealy mouthed corporatist crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Universal health care? Are you kidding?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Doesn't matter if they could get it passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. I disagree - I think this is a political dagger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 07:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
106. I agree and we all need to understand that they need support! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eg101
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. chicken-egg: it'll NEVER come to pass if they don't start talking about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. This is how we "start somewhere" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eg101
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
60. clue: the surrender monkeys aint in France (and never were) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. LOL -- "Surrender monkeys" - and the rights wins with that stuff!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. But we aren't buying a car... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xpat
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
17. I signed it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
20. Endorsed with note condemning all corporate influence on party’s agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
22. Done! Let's stand with them and also hold their feet to the fire! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
24. Have I overlooked it? Where is ELECTION REFORM???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Apperently it is not a top priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. It's one of the ten pieces of legislation-- see link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Oh yeah, it's there -- It's the "Democracy Begins at Home" bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Thanks - I signed on with these comments! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Those are really good comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
61. That was not a US Supreme Court case, it was a Florida case and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
25. Signed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
26. Done! And added election reform as a priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
28. I won't sign on to this Republican Lite "safe" list which won't change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
45. But.... you're not really... are you actually,, (spluttering) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:24 PM Response to Reply #45 |
58. Too many of the ones who are already there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dissent Is Patriotic
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
80. Amen! I don't want people pussy-footing around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'll sign on after the first signs that they are actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. the many Dems saying NO to Condi today is a signal that this is NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. 40000 more troops for out bloated military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. I honestly think you're missing the point of the Dems doing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. "this whole agenda is a political weapon" - two problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Not so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. the Contract with America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. "Contract with America' wasn't a "bold" agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. And when the Republicanites got control of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
83. What's bloated about a military that has to send it's clerks out to fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #83 |
117. So, that the "clerks" can free up the killers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 06:39 PM Response to Reply #117 |
133. So that we can replace the clerks who have been replacing the dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
39. Now I understand the where the stereotype comes from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Yeah, right, exactly -- that's what I was trying to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. As long as it makes you happy n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. The New Democratic version of Newt's contract on America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. Did you actually read this whole thread before posting?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. much of the Contract with America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. I disagree. Step ONE should be to stop working with the.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 03:38 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Yes, you're right, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sophie996
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. thanks, Q! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John H. St.John
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. Fed up to the eyeballs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #77 |
97. Thank you for your historical perspective, John H. St. John, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
59. Exactly, Q, on all points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coloradan4Truth
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. Signed and stated that we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
47. I signed it and forwarded it to several lists and friends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
49. Added my name and this comment: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleurs du Mal
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
66. Hmm, I can't sign that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Okay, I admit it, the agenda is flagrantly political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
69. I cannot sign it with a clear conscience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. I hate to reveal my ignorance, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #72 |
85. DNC Chair is chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:55 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I wouldn't be at all suprised if Dean gets it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #86 |
120. Last I heard, Dean has around 70% support from DNC delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kota
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
71. I am glad I saw this, it should be kept kicked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
73. I Want To Scream! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. What do you think about "Action Plan"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:37 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Or Promise/Pledge To Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:10 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. I really like that -- Dems can say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. I Told Them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
74. We signed it-thanks so much for posting this...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jo March
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
76. I signed it and told them to stand up and FIGHT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
79. How will we pay for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #79 |
115. Good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
84. Soo cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
87. deciding not to sign in 5 easy-to-follow steps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Yeah!! It's not enough that it's GOOD - I want PERFECT dammit!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. specious argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. You're right about Iraq - but no wonder these people are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. well, on that we agree ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. It's a wonderful, important list... it's just not PUUUURE ENOUUUUGHHH... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 07:48 AM Response to Reply #91 |
107. Good point, ClassWarrior. I am always amazed at the lack of understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #107 |
116. Deleted message |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:47 PM Response to Reply #88 |
98. If it were even GOOD, I might consider signing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Ahhh... so now we're asking them to make up for 25 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. No, just make up for all the damage they've allowed to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #102 |
110. They are trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #110 |
118. But these proposals set "goals," and if the "goals" look like baby steps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:54 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Asking Welsh Terrier to reconsider in 5 bullet points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:27 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. immoral Iraq policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:09 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. thanks for the links (chilling) -- I agree with you 100% it's a mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 11:26 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. the Dems "non policy" on Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:07 AM Response to Reply #101 |
103. You're too smart to argue with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:36 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. "we have to get pragmatic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Those are two different times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 08:49 PM Response to Reply #105 |
135. Almost missed your reply - I'm glad I re-read this from the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:50 PM Response to Reply #103 |
121. Here's the problem, Moggie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. yes, I agree, it needs to be in sound-bites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. Sorry, it is going to keep me from signing, because it's the wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Lydia, Lydia, Lydia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:06 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. the problem with analogies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. Rats, I thought that analogy would nail it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. healing the rifts ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #140 |
143. Wow, that was a powerful articulation of the left's "case" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:17 PM Response to Reply #134 |
142. But the Democrats haven't been "bad"--just timid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:32 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. That sounds intriguing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:59 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. For example: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #145 |
146. I do like many of these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
90. Thanks for reposting this moggie n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marcologico
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-05 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
94. Lame, lame, lame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:27 AM Response to Reply #94 |
111. Pragmatic, pragmatic, pragmatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marcologico
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Yeah I know. It's a start. But the whole military-terrorist "agenda" is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. I'm hoping that "this start" will start opening some eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marcologico
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #114 |
138. sure I'll sign it but do we have to seem so eager to forgive GOP fuck-ups? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. yes, our guys in Congress finally seem to be realizing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
104. Done, Thanks for posting that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 07:50 AM Response to Reply #104 |
108. kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Califooyah Operative
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
109. I'm pleased with the agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
119. Isn't this the same lame-ass platform K/E ran on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. Demand the impossible??!! Demand the impossible??!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. Yes, "demand the impossible" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. I can't wait 70 years -- I'll be dead and my kids will be on SS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. If you demand "baby steps", you'll get "microscopic steps" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. What you see as "baby steps", I see as "sound bites" to get attn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:45 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. Also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #125 |
131. I thought of a better example--going to the moon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:08 PM Response to Reply #131 |
141. this is really good ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FromTheLeft
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:30 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. I think that you are looking at this wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. You're wrong-- we HAVE NOT stated that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Califooyah Operative
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
147. kick. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC