|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:20 PM Original message |
Frost suggests Lieberman be voice of Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Voice of the Republican Party maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark H
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 09:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
75. Joe Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #75 |
102. We need to seize on opportunities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. Frost really doesn't to be DNC chair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fertilizeonarbusto
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. He just did himself in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
63. He tried to be Joe Lieberman himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
118. Why would he be so suicidal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. Frost gets in, I get out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't f'ing THINK so! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why bother having two parties. Frost and Delay can join hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joanski01
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Lieberman the voice of the Party !!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Hi Joanski01 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joanski01
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Geez Cheswick, I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. And here I thought you always had word docs or something all stored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joanski01
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Oh, sweetie, I think you have me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. I wonder how hard frost had to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhr
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. I Worked Frost's Last Campaign And Even I Am Shocked By This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. Lieberman a man out of his time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cadence
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Lieberman is such a tool. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. Oh no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. Frost must be secretly for Dean or else he wouldn't suggest such |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. man, I think that seals his fate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Wow! What a shock with Ickes endorsement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. it blew me away too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
45. Me, too! I just had to read that twice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #45 |
89. Ickes!?!?!?!? Wow. Just WOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think I just threw up in my throat a little bit. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Deleted message |
lojasmo
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:12 PM Original message |
I don't understand the reference..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
27. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. Deleted message |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
21. Barf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. NC State Chair Race is Similar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. Wow, what an idiot. Lieberman is a fucking joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. He is...the Republican Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArtVandaley
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
25. Frost wants to let the republicans frame the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. That's the worst suggestion I've ever heard from a Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. If Frost gets it, we are truly and totally screwed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
30. Looks like Dean and Frost agree that Dems lost due to national security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. National security has what to do with the Iraq war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 11:00 PM Response to Reply #47 |
62. Actually, there's an INVERSE relationship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #62 |
78. yup, we were better off before the war..........much safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:42 AM Response to Reply #30 |
87. I don't agree that "Democrats" couldn't convince people. I think.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al-CIAda
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. "Frost suggests Lieberman be voice of Party" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
33. I realize that Frost is just trying to get a gig after re-districting but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Frost needs a blogger interface advisor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
36. Wow, I guess DU'ers can't read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yep. God forbid that war protestors and pacifists have a voice anywhwere.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. It depends -- how badly do you want a one party state? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. nice slide under the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Most of the country doesn't trust Democrats to keep them safe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Deleted message |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
93. EXCELLENT, and I'll add this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
116. Deleted message |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. For the record, I oppose STUPID war, not all war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
74. The Viet-Nam war deeply divided this country. I live in an area with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:54 PM Response to Reply #74 |
98. Dont paint all Vietnam era vets with that broad brush, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:30 PM Response to Reply #98 |
112. It is not the Viet-Nam vet that I am basically talking about. It is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
103. My room mate died in April last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:35 PM Response to Reply #103 |
113. Again, I was not talking about the Vets. I was talking about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
104. I am not a pacifist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 06:23 AM Response to Reply #41 |
71. Right. Accept their frame. Accept that we have to scare the bejeezus-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #41 |
85. I actually think that Kerry would have done better if he had been.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
100. right, because it's helped us so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. maybe if we would do bush one better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. now you *know* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. I am sure one of them is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. If this guy throws out the name "Lieberman" in even the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
54. Ah, but credible with whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 10:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
61. This approach really helped Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:51 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. What approach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:02 AM Response to Reply #36 |
67. Sorry Dolstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:38 AM Response to Reply #36 |
86. How is Lieberman credible? By buying Bush's lies..hook, line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #86 |
96. Uh, 3 million VOTES (presumably), not 3 million PERSONS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:55 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. thanks for the correction :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
109. but it's not working! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Deleted message |
Emboldened Chimp
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. What's wrong with the party getting a little bit of Joe-mentum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
40. Maybe Frost is sniffing votes somewhere near -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
42. This guy is REALLY out of touch with our party base. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynintenn
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
51. Joe loserman is a traitor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
52. Democrats want Peace not GOP war-mongering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
53. Hell no. (to Lieberman) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
resist
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
55. Then he should sit down and shut up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Wolf
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
56. If Frost had any brains, he would know that the people should be the voice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
57. Well, he just lost me. Lieberman is the problem. Not the solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightTrain
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
58. Which party?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. That was my first thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
60. Hey, relax. It's all a misunderstanding. He meant LETTERMAN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
64. Yeah. Spend your life currying favor with those who want to destroy you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:51 AM Response to Original message |
66. He sounds constipated! What are they thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:06 AM Response to Original message |
68. Frost is basically irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressiveright
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
69. this is all you need to know about Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfern
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
70. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
72. Lieberman, voice of the party. No. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
73. Great thundering gods.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 10:08 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. How could such a large group of Democrats be so clueless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
77. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 10:55 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Deleted message |
janx
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
81. This sounds desperate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeG
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
83. Urrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KissMeKate
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
84. I think they will slip in Rosenberg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
92. no doubt they are trying to do so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
88. Nail in the coffin indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
90. Lieberman??????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gyre
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
91. Lieberman =s Zell Miller w/o any balls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. to imply that Zell Miller has balls is way off the mark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
95. And as the DNC chair goes so shall the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Yes, Tinoire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Yes they are indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
106. He's Got "Joe-Mentum"! Wooo-Hooo! Yippeeee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
108. This is a joke right? Already emailed state party and said for them to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
111. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
114. Deleted message |
0007
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
115. No way!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Va Lefty
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
117. Frost can go "cheney himself" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC