|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
usregimechange
![]() |
Sat Feb-26-05 11:47 PM Original message |
Is not a Edwards Clark (or vice versa) ticket fabulous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Comicstripper
![]() |
Sat Feb-26-05 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think that ticket has enough experience... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-26-05 11:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Experience is overrated. What would have mattered was that people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I hear what you're saying...but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I think the Democrats stood a much better chance if they worried more ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Again, I hear what you're saying and agree with a lot of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. The Cold War. Vietnam. We've been through 'global insecurity' before and.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'm certain they were considering all the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. ...and Kerry v Bush even at 47, Edwards v Bush, Edwards +11. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 02:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
69. Edwards is at 48, Bush 37 in that poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 12:05 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. I think undecideds would NOT have broken better than 13:2 for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avis
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. Love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. me too, something fresh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. They are both outsiders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
8. Sorry, too early for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
12. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Clark IS antiwar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Okay, but what about his DLC connections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 03:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Chestnut alert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
42. Ive said it before (Once this morning already!)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
41. This is RICH... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 05:20 AM Response to Reply #41 |
72. Actually, I worry about BOTH of them being "DLC". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. Antiwar means knowing how to keep the peace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
73. By what stretch of logic are Kerry and Edwards more hawk than * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
15. Edwards and Feingold are a much better combination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:12 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Clark doesn't have a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trillian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:28 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It was about NS and it will be again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Deleted message |
dogman
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Talk about clueless! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
60. I know enough about Peak oil to know that, duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:27 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. That's why we have a great opportunity and alternative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
51. Guess again, National Security and the Economic Crisis are INTERWOVEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. I don't guess, I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:26 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. O.K. so be done, but people voted for SAFETY w/ Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
39. Why fight a battle we can't win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. None of the Dems are likely to sway Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trillian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
18. Clark/anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:40 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. That's a load of garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
56. Tell that to PBS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
19. As long as the ticket is not focused on "war" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trillian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:40 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Are you kidding??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:49 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Blacked him out during the primaries??? Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trillian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:10 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. CNN did not mention him once....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
48. Your love for Edwards is overwhelming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 01:15 AM Response to Reply #48 |
67. Sorry, polls showed Edwards moving into a strong position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. Isn't NH quite close to N Carolina? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 07:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
53. You really didn't follow Clark too closely, or you wouldn't be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
21. Any Ticket With Clark At The Top Would Be Great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rjx
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. Dean/Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
27. It would be one of several good tickets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
28. Democrats always seem to do things one election too late. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
29. That was THE BEST scenario for 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
33. The use of "fabulous" captures this thread. "2001 was a fabulous year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
34. Clark has more experience than Edwards and Kerry combined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LdyGuique
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
35. Sorry, I don't agree at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Yeah, you know, Arnold Schwarzennegger paid LOTS of dues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LdyGuique
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. Yeah, I know California has this "thing" about movie stars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
36. Clark was the one last time. We need him next time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
58. The best offense is a good defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
59. It is best not to be reactive, but proactive for peace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippywife
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
40. No. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaLefty
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
47. Edwards Might Be Clobbered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. Russ would get both coasts (except mid-South) and many parts of midwest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. I repeat. Do not underestimate the stupidity of the American voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaLefty
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:27 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
49. The problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 03:24 AM Response to Reply #49 |
70. You made my point....had one of those in office for eight years, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Clark's positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
54. I bet Edwards AND Clark would deliver the South... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:35 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. Deleted message |
ZootSuitGringo
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 03:27 AM Response to Reply #54 |
71. Clark wasn't running by the time they held a primary in his home state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem
![]() |
Sun Feb-27-05 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
66. Sure to get at least 35% of the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
68. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra
![]() |
Mon Feb-28-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. Clark/Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC