|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:07 AM Original message |
I will * NOT * support Hillary Clinton for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe we will get two dynastys in 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. My worst nightmare!!! Shudder!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
167. I would endorse Barbara Boxer over Hillary in a New York minute! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. Dynasty, smynasty. Hillary is qualified to be president... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. "Qualified" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. just for the record, Kahuna didn't say Hillary was MORE qualified... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. But he did say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:15 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. It depends on what your definition of qualified is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:46 AM Response to Reply #34 |
121. Jesus H. Christ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #121 |
137. Perhaps you forgot the point of the primaries.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:21 PM Response to Reply #137 |
152. just because someone may like Hillary for Prez doesn't ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 07:47 AM Response to Reply #152 |
161. Oh, nice strategy for the primaries... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #161 |
173. I'm not a Hillary supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 02:23 AM Response to Reply #173 |
176. Who I support is irrelevant.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
194. Thanks Wyldwolf.. But.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:50 AM Response to Reply #13 |
193. Whatever! Don't assume, k? I would have been delighted.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. LOTS of people are qualified to be President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #20 |
125. I have nothing against effective people who stay a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
48. HOW is she qualified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Electro-fraud voting means she would WIN?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:11 AM Response to Reply #55 |
94. I meant Pickles would win with electro-fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:55 AM Response to Reply #48 |
195. She's just as qualified as one term senator with no prior .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 12:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
160. After bush America is ready for a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:57 AM Response to Reply #160 |
196. Right! I only want strong candidates to run.... My ideal field includes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. I won't support her, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
24. I'll support whoever the Democratic nominee is, period, if I think they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I understand that completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
78. I Agree that Hillary is a Dino/Rhino... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:11 AM Response to Reply #78 |
119. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #119 |
136. It's GOT.TO.STOP - NOW! Or We're Indentured, forever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
74. Hang in there I understand that Rove might back Jeb Bush in 08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
197. Of course he will. Is there any doubt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. I have a different reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
46. So you did not vote for the Kerry/Edwards ticket in 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
71. a foolish reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #71 |
147. You are correct, but it STILL gave Bush the authority to go to war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 10:14 PM Response to Reply #147 |
155. yes - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #155 |
170. Voting no would have given Dems a stronger stance now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #170 |
172. it would give them a stronger stance with those who opposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 01:35 AM Response to Reply #172 |
174. Partially true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 05:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
198. Then that will be a liability for Hillary and Kerry and Edwards.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty48197
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
5. I like her. Don't blame her that her husband was President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. "Blame" is the wrong word. She & Bill were a team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
47. Chelsea Clinton? How does she enter into any political equation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #47 |
64. Its part of my "no immediate family" thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
norml
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
6. What makes you think she's running for President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I agree! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. I don't know or care whether she is FORMALLY running for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
8. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
29. IF she is the nominee, then I will assume the Democrats are morans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. I already assume some are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
9. *if* she wins the nomination, will she have your vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. I don't know. I do not appreciate being forced to pick the "lesser" of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
83. Lettiing the greater of two evils take office...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
11. "Dynasty" talk aside, I just think there are plenty of others who'd.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
14. But if the choices in 2008 are between Hillary and the GOP candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Not every time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:22 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. We have played that losing game in 2000 and 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Sorry, but I refuse to go along with that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I used to think that but that helped Bush win the popular vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Well, I voted for Kerry.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
19. She will not be the candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
31. If only I could believe you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Try telling that to the Talking Heads.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
44. We can only pray. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
21. Hillary shouldn't be discounted just BECAUSE she was First Lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Such a law would have kept Franklin Delano Roosevelt from the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:34 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. The law I mentioned would protect from dynasties, ie there should be a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekG
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Would you have supported Bobby Kennedy for president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Bobby Kennedy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekG
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. As I suggested, Clinton isn't fit to even invoke his name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:09 PM Response to Reply #54 |
146. What a relief! so you won't be voting for one of the Bushes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
66. Honestly, I don't know. This sounds terrible, but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
33. I believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Feingold said something to the opposite of that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Tell that to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:48 AM Response to Reply #45 |
97. I don't understand your point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #97 |
129. They had none.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #129 |
138. So then it sounds like you would disagree with.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #138 |
151. Yes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
40. I just think we need to win... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
41. So who asked you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
42. Reframe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:52 AM Response to Reply #42 |
98. Unfortunately.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
43. Hmm. My honest opinion: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:08 AM Response to Reply #43 |
200. My honest opinion.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mich Otter
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
50. A problem I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #50 |
99. The problem with that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
51. I will not support Hilary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
52. I too hope she doesn't run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
53. My problem is with her politics, plus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
56. If she's the nominee, I'll fully support her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
57. I hate dynastys too! I am looking at each possible candidate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aspberger
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
58. HILLARY IS A WINNER ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. lmao |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. Guts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aspberger
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:46 AM Response to Reply #69 |
120. you betcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 10:26 AM Response to Reply #120 |
126. Deal with the devil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aspberger
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. my hope is with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #128 |
133. The world is violent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aspberger
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #133 |
156. I don't think Clinton is pro-violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 12:16 AM Response to Reply #156 |
159. I supported a General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. KICK, KICK, KICK, KICK, KICK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaliraqvet26
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
61. LETS NOT CUT OFF.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I dont think Hillary will run-- I thikn she knows her best position is in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
63. fine- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
65. I won't support her either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Coliniere
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
67. God I hope we can do better than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spacelady
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
68. As a woman who would just love to have a female President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkAngel
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
70. I don't wanna vote for Hillary either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
72. Hillary would make a good REPUBLICAN president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
73. Wes Clark is the man in 08'! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. A vote for Clark is a vote for Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #81 |
132. Hmmm. I would like you to fill me in on "the plan." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. The plan as I heard it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #135 |
153. Clark/Warner, Obama, Bredersen, etc...08' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 10:32 PM Response to Reply #135 |
157. The only reason he doesn't have a chance is because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 12:05 AM Response to Reply #135 |
158. Understanding General Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
75. I totally agree with you in regards to no presidential dynasties- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:51 PM Original message |
How can you call it a dynasty. Don't children have to be involved, by def. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
91. No. Dynastic succession usually refers to "family" -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
76. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
77. NOT even ONE REASON, or mention of Kennedys or Roosevelts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
90. Because she's already had ultimate access to power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:58 AM Response to Reply #90 |
117. I see your point better, but, still don't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joj Bush
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
79. What's the big problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:01 AM Response to Reply #79 |
101. I don't think she's qualified... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
80. Would she be a viable candidate if her name was Hillary Jackson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
82. Well I'm about to Blow a frigging gasket here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:09 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. You got me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:24 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. So now what I'm still trying to find out is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:26 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Some of our DU colleagues must be smoking some good shit to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:05 AM Response to Reply #88 |
103. Self-fulfilling prophercy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #82 |
95. The question has less to do with her electability for me -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #82 |
127. They won't elect her but it isn't only because of her gender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:19 AM Response to Reply #82 |
202. Because... bush and his evil henchmen is a prime example of.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
84. I agree with your point about dynasties but if Hillary is our nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeinesRed
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
86. No Cabinet Position for you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeinesRed
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-05 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
87. Married persons do not count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:07 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. I disagree. I think she was / is a true partner to President Clinton -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
92. I will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chokey
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
96. Hillary's not prefect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:03 AM Response to Reply #96 |
102. My theory.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:11 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. That's part of the problem.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. How do you propose we change this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:58 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. If you're frustrated, here's a remedy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:08 AM Response to Reply #96 |
104. Blanche Lincoln |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:15 AM Response to Reply #96 |
201. Hillary may already be a run away train by the time '08 rolls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:40 PM Response to Reply #201 |
206. Then why....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
100. She'd make a great President. Don't know if she's the most "electable" for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:32 PM Response to Reply #100 |
131. "she can become electable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
106. One major point about Hillary everyone seems to be missing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:36 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Evan Bayh is a puke and a coward! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:44 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. But he still could win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:47 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Bayh won't even carry Indiana, and he is more boring than Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 02:00 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. So your issue is with Bayh specifically? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 02:32 PM Response to Reply #113 |
134. Write off Jesusland! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:36 PM Response to Reply #134 |
140. Are you seriously suggesting writing off Southern congressional seats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. Have you read my post you would have seen that I was not talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. So then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. We don't need the South to win! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 12:10 PM Response to Reply #145 |
166. I'm not talking about the Electoral College... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:52 AM Response to Reply #106 |
122. Pryor has no worries at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gelliebeans
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
107. I am with you 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
114. i agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 03:07 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Right on!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evilkumquat
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
116. I Remember Laughing When Bush Was Nominated For 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 07:39 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Thank you! I remember thinking the same thing! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
123. before knowing george that was number one reason, has gotten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Township75
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
124. I won't vote for her either for many reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
130. The only way I would support Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
139. Step right up, DU, and get played for a sucker... again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. It's not "diatribe" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. Keep up the good work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #139 |
148. Read the thread please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #148 |
150. Spare me your condescension, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #150 |
154. Spare me your rudeness please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #154 |
164. Yep, you've mastered the art of projection and misdirection, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
149. Not A Good Reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
162. not particularly smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
163. It kills me that people are so eager to see her run for pres in 08! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 08:27 AM Response to Reply #163 |
177. oops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladeuxiemevoiture
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
165. It was nice that she showed up at the NY Gay Pride Parade yesterday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
168. I'd take the 1993 Version. Or the 1972 Version. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
169. I agree, somebody besides a B:ush or Clinton. US is no banana republic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-05 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
171. I Will Vote for Hillary nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfern
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
175. There's a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScamUSA.Com
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
178. you know she's a loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atomicdawg38
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-05 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
179. I wouldn't want to vote for Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
180. Another pro-Hillary talking point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
181. Mike Ruppert thinks Hillary is the "anointed" one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
182. Hillary '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 08:52 PM Response to Reply #182 |
183. Crystal ball? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
184. If Hillary wins the nomination, I will change my party registration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #184 |
185. Actually, Dennis Kucinich is less electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #185 |
186. I don't agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1
![]() |
Wed Jun-29-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #186 |
187. I wish you were right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 02:16 AM Response to Reply #187 |
188. While Hillary can "become" electable.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meppie-meppie not
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 02:24 AM Response to Reply #188 |
190. she is not electable because your country is not enlightened enough to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 02:28 AM Response to Reply #190 |
192. So only a white male can run in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meppie-meppie not
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #192 |
204. sadly that is what I am saying. Canada. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:44 PM Response to Reply #204 |
207. What about....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meppie-meppie not
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
189. I hardly consider she and her husband a dynasty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 02:27 AM Response to Reply #189 |
191. I don't think it's the best comparison either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meppie-meppie not
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #191 |
203. I see the point Ida was trying to make now, thanks for taking the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 06:06 AM Response to Reply #189 |
199. Then they should get their damn hooks off the Democratic party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meppie-meppie not
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #199 |
205. I was taking issue with the comparison and in doing so gave the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC