|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ncrainbowgrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Original message |
********OFFICIAL HACKETT ELECTION RESULTS THREAD!******** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MeDeMax
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Original message |
Hackett election results link from channel 9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithnotgreed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. thank you~ likely du will overload their server |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. It appears from doing a refresh that they update every two minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. FIRST RESULTS COMING IN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
56. FWI - Swing State said those were Absentee Ballots results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. What's with that station's yellow ribbon crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
68. It's for PFC Matt Maupin...still missing in Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. I hope we don't get let down again!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. this is a very Republican district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Yup! You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
47. Looks like they are holding results back while Hackett is ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terre
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
63. Here's another link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
98. exactly 0 results at 8:14pm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Reply #98 |
107. They've only been closed for 45 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Brown County |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. OH BOY!! Good start!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:52 PM Original message |
What has been the best county for the dems? Any blue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
69. Well, it looks like Warren and Clermont will be the worst. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T.
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Ohio: Brown County Results: Hackett 52.9% Schmidt 46.6% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. that's a good county to be up in too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. keeping my finger crossed here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. well, it's a start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaliraqvet26
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. where is brown county? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sean Reynolds
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Bush won with 64% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. what were the results from the 04 election in brown? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sean Reynolds
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Bush won with 64% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. With, rather. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sean Reynolds
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. My bad..you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elperromagico
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
62. In the 2004 Congressional race, Brown voted like this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Where'd you get that link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. What a great start!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matt819
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. True, it's a start. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. Nice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeBushytail
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
92. I think that's just absentee ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeBushytail
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Brown County looking Good first non-absentee votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. For god sakes - how can someone over or under vote with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. There is a couple local tax issues on the ballot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Ok - but this has still got to be a very short ballot. Just hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
53. I think this is what is on the ballot. At least this is what WCPO shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. school & road levies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. I believe there are also local ballot initiatives as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. Yes, I think in just 19 precincts, though. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimmyJazz
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
18. I am so excited about this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithnotgreed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. shades of november |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. You know what? I miss Dan Rather!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
26. Give it up for Hackett!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hamilton is starting to trickle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Absentee I betcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Are those the first ones to be counted or the last? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:55 PM Original message |
Almost always first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Probably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Bush had 52.5% in Hamilton. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. WCPO site VERY unreliable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Hamilton is a large county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:03 PM Original message |
Yes- 300-some odd precincts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Umm - where did these #'s come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Check DU's front page for URLs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Look HOW CLOSE it is!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. There's Only One Word... If he Loses!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. I thought you meant F for fraud! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:59 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. There are a few words that I would have..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. NO, THE TWO WORDS ARE -- MANUAL RECOUNT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. I am from WA state, you see... :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #59 |
99. Bumlebee... Me too!!! ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elperromagico
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
67. Hamilton voted for Portman (the Republican) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
46. Did anyone hear him on Randi?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
48. blah blah blah, what does this all mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Nothing much yet...beyond the fact that it's closer than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. If you are not interested, I suppose there are other places to post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPNotForMe
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
55. This "silence" is killing me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:05 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Take some screen snapshots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:05 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Me too -- or trying the links on the main page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncrainbowgrrl
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:05 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. sounds way familiar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Apparently, Hackett just won Brown County. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. He didn't. Those were absentee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The King
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. only absentee votes in Brown counted so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nickster
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
57. GO MAJOR HACKETT!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
64. Take a look at the 2004 results, Pike Co and Scioto Co, split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. As I analize those results Scioto is the best place to pick up blue votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:10 PM Original message |
Clermont Co, is the one that will kill us, looks like Cincy suburbs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
65. Wheee-Hooooo.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vox_Reason
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
73. GO PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
74. Absentee Ballot results: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. is that a final on the absentees? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
83. That's Hamilton County |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EugeneVDebs
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
75. Disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeveneightyWhoa
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Who gives a shi'ite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimmyJazz
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #75 |
82. That's not possible. They are supposed to leave the soldier bashing to us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EugeneVDebs
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #82 |
100. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brucefan
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #75 |
91. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elperromagico
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
76. Complete County results for 2004 Congressional race can be found here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
79. It looks like Hacket won Brown Co. anyone confirm this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Wait, that isn't enough votes but it says 100% of 35???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FW_
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. 1.57% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. 35 of 35 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #81 |
95. nearly 20,000 voted in the presidential election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Reply #81 |
106. Ok, but he is WINNING Brown, by 58%! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. Yes, Brown goes for Hackett --- boy these result sites are SLOW! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #84 |
94. Okay...but this slowness is frustrating nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeBushytail
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #79 |
87. I think that's just absentee ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #79 |
88. Just absentees. We have a long night to go folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. I Can Not Stand This!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indy_azcat
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #79 |
90. look at the upper right corner: ABSENTEE RESULTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:19 PM Original message |
They are starting normal ballots now for brown, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #79 |
93. those are only absentee ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Original message |
Where does it say "Absentee ballots?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #93 |
102. If Hackett wins the absentee vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
97. Updated Numbers for Brown (Hackett has 58.6%) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. NOICE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeBushytail
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #97 |
110. That's even better - Hackett 58% Schmidt 41% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
101. Early Voting in Clermont: Schmidt 60 - Hackett 40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #101 |
112. It's only early voting in Clermont .....but BROWN COUNTY is remarkable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:25 PM Response to Reply #101 |
120. Which county is larger? Clermont or Brown? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #101 |
121. It says that the 1158 to 750 is from all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
103. HACKETT IS WIDENING HIS LEAD IN BROWN COUNTY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
105. Ouch, Clermont County |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. This county will kill us I am telling you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeefanatic3
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #109 |
122. Save bandwidth..give up WPCO..NO Results yet from them nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #105 |
113. Just early votes.. still early.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeBushytail
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Less than 2,000 votes counted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #105 |
117. combine both counties and Hackett is up by 24 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #105 |
118. probably absentee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
108. Clermont results starting to trickle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrank
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
111. Whether he wins or loses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
114. Is Hamilton County is where Cincinnati is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:25 PM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Yep, but looked like no 2nd district votes from hamilton to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
116. hold on...the darkest hours are before the dawn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:26 PM Original message |
I don't know if my heart can take this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
123. Air America just got a call... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Tue Aug-02-05 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
124. Thread two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC