|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 03:27 AM Original message |
Poll question: Predict the Outcome of the '08 Iowa Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chipper Chat
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. Other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. people don't "Diebold" in the Iowa Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
57. But becasue of the small media market |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I'm late to respond to your post, Chipper Chat -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. They usually want cookies as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Hi, Debi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Thanks for the education on the process in Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. The scream was after Iowa as the results were reported. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senaca
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. How much influence does Harken have in helping deliver for the primaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Well....Harkin endorsed Dean in 2004, so..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chipper Chat
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
47. I was painting the entire US political process with a cynical quip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. Voted other because there are far too many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
29. That would be good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
46. I concur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. WAY too early to tell (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Agreed. But the candidates' staffs and advance people -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. we don't even know who is running. . .EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. We have some good preview possibilities, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. Oh for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. MMMmmmm. The plot thickens. I appreciate -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. my prediction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Sounds about right. Iowa is one of those -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstans
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 05:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. That is not a bad prediction for the middle of January |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CornField
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Iowa will not go for Kerry again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 01:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Hi to you, Cornfield. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IA_Seth
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. I would hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 01:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. IA_Seth, you make good sense. Sounds like you know -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kindigger
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. Clinton hasn't a chance in H*ll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Hi, dragndust, haven't seen you in the Iowa Forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 08:28 AM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Clinton will not go for Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. Yeah Clinton County!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 08:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Braley is hot here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Thanks for the update ! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Did Edwards really get the Kuchinich people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Kucinich people (at least in my town) hated Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 07:40 PM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Thanks Debi - It really seems like the people who get involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Vilsack was Kerry's choice for DNC Chair after he chose Edwards as VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Thanks for the information - I hope he's not the candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
32. I think Clinton's problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. Edwards and Clark in a virtual tie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 01:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Bold and specific. kevsand, appreciate what -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstans
![]() |
Tue Dec-13-05 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. Vilsack is running and was only included in 2 of the choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 02:02 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. All strong points, and I allow a 10th choice for any -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. I'm not familiar with Vilsack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 05:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Good point--one always has to factor in "favorite son" appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
26. and what is the point of this poll again? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:09 AM Response to Original message |
28. Right now I would love |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:16 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Kerry makes noises as if he's considering another run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:30 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I think so too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Very good point on Tim Kaine. Sorry to say I was not -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
36. Other: Edwards /Warner /Kerry /Clinton /Bayh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. A believable order of finish. I had a chance to talk -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. What about Feingold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
41. Vilsak, Clark, Clinton, Warner, Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Hi, Tom Rinaldo. I agree with you that it's mighty early yet -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Wow, a case of almost total GMTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guidod
![]() |
Wed Dec-14-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
48. Warner first then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 01:56 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Hi, guidod. Warner? He could do it. I've only heard him --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guidod
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I think McCain is going to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
51. Warner, Feingold, Hillary, Bayh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 01:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. It could happen. A close friend in Virginia admits a pro-Warner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
59. I voted Warner- Clinton-Feingold- Edwards-Bayh, but I think Bayh will fold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
60. Does other mean "wait and see" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
63. A related prediction about Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. This is exactly why Vilsack 'sold out' Iowa in the DNC calendar commission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 04:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. As long as they don't group them by region.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 04:14 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. My only argument for regional is to allow small states to vote together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:20 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. As I understand the argument of using small states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Mon Dec-19-05 02:07 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. So, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton should not have bothered? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC