|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wndycty
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 10:48 AM Original message |
Cegelis DID NOT have a lock on the 6th CD nomination before Duckworth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. Good point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. I like Tammy Duckworth a lot, from what I've read about her and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good skew there in percentage favorable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 03:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Cegelis hurt her own campaign pissing away her money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. This has been an orchestrated attack on the Cegelis campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. It's facts catching up with bullshit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Another statement you forgot to mention...poll flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. I say we continue to run past losers and ignore fresh new candidates.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. A veiled attack..."past loser"...emphasize military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Cegelis IS a past loser and a four-star disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Such a shame all the attacks you guys have done on her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yeah, how dare anyone point out facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 07:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Don't you realize there is a certain mindset that. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 07:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. They know what the people want.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 08:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Well I'm not surprised. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 08:54 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Meanwhile, if I was a Cegelis supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. "The poll is flawed because of its small sample size and weighting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Here is your answer. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Not what I was talking about above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Duckworth has party machinery working for her in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Oh brother. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. But the other day I was told I was lying about it, told to prove it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Wed Dec-21-05 12:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Again. . .oh brother. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 04:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC