|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:15 AM Original message |
Is there anyway to override a Presidential Pardon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. The Founding Fathers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I will read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. you impeach him before that happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 09:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. LOL !! You have a problem of timing regarding your idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 10:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. don't have much alternative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. That won't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. No, there aren't any limits I am aware of (edit: IANAL) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 04:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. I disagree, this is the first step down a dangerous path |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. No, pardons are pardons, and that is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
9. The right answer is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. hey, that is a scrap of paper. Don't refer to it - it is a quaint, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 12:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I think you misread this clause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. Iran-Contra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Can't they still be brought in as a material witness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 09:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. They can say, "I don't remember." It has been used very successfully. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. It's been said on here by knowledgeable posters that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KBlagburn (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. This premise has no basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. And what crime was Nixon Pardoned for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
21. Vigilantism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. No (nt). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC