|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:29 PM Original message |
Ned Lamont; quit while your behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. what? Is there a problem with stating an opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Ohh I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Deleted message |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Hey Sammy, get a life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Deleted message |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:07 AM Response to Reply #52 |
117. wassup dancin bear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. My, what a classy and erudite response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. So you want Connecticut voters to be forced to vote for Lowell Weicker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Weicker is a has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It was actually a very close race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
168. While I favor Weicker (as a non-republican) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
161. We doesn't even need to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. your behind is what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinksrival
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. How Rude! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
118. like your sig line! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. But maybe it will help Lieberman in the general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. He enjoys strong support among Democrats and Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:12 AM Response to Reply #13 |
119. then why call for the liberal progressive to exit the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Say what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. The GOP believes Lieberman will win the Democratic nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Hypothetical then...If Lieberman lost the Democratic primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #42 |
72. That's a pretty bizarre hypothetical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:06 PM Response to Reply #34 |
162. It's called FUSION VOTING - Open Ballot Voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Thanks for letting us know how frightened Lieberman is! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Sorry to tell you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. When's the last time a sitting senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Oh please, this is a bunch of crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. You're probably right, which is why Lieberman did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
69. Again, more crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. He could finally admit the war was wrong, and stop bashing peace Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #73 |
84. He's not "bashing" peace Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:20 PM Response to Reply #84 |
135. Lieberman set up a group with Lynne Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #135 |
142. Please provide a quote of Lieberman "bashing" Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 05:01 AM Response to Reply #142 |
145. Setting up a peacenik-bashing PAC with Lynne Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:51 AM Response to Reply #142 |
149. here is one link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #149 |
164. Yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #149 |
170. Is that the best you can do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 12:04 AM Response to Reply #170 |
176. Accusing the Democratic Party of endangering American Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 12:37 AM Response to Reply #176 |
177. That's not what he said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:07 PM Response to Reply #142 |
163. DUers aren't SENATORS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:48 PM Response to Reply #69 |
82. Can I ask why you feel so strongly about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. You can ask, but I don't think they'll tell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #82 |
88. I'm a Democrat, that's why I feel strongly about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. Would it be fair to say that the larger issue is not Joe Lieberman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:25 PM Response to Reply #88 |
137. Puhlease... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #88 |
139. talking about a brutal and immoral foreign policy is talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #88 |
141. If he went against the war, we'd be at war anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. monday I will get in another 25 buck to lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
98. Heaven and Earth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
59. Seems like you're asserting that it's pretty much a Slam Dunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
77. I believe he also backs bush on the port deal...and if he backs him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
79. Not all of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
147. So the people of CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belpejic
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belpejic
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Furthermore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. it's actually bigger than Lieberman's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
85. Wyldwolf, just because Lieberman enjoys Huge Republican Support, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 05:57 AM Response to Reply #85 |
110. what does your point have to do with Lieberman's behind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belpejic
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 07:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
113. Nice try, wyldwolf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. Deleted message |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. you have a lot less posts than I do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I just started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. I was talking to Teaser, not to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. You don't know my post count coolio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. unless you post under several identities, you post count, coolio... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. wrongo, ODB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. well, then, snoop dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:16 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. I have only ever had a single account here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. with 3653 posts and counting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. It's not the size of the post count, it's what you do with them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. exactly, so why did coolio point out a poster's post count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Deleted message |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Diddy, Snoop Dogg, enough already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Yo! Word to your mutha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Stay out of this, Vanilla! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. And I been here WAY longer than you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. but you're the one who is making post counts an issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. I am NOT from connecticut, but I donated to Ned Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. What is there not to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Liberman has helped kill 2300 Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
74. Actually, Ralph Nader and his supporters are responsible for these deaths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #74 |
87. You're assuming Gore wouldn't have caved to the war party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Did you vote for Gore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:13 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I live in Alaska, so my vote really didn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:18 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Let me get this straight -- you quit the party, think Clinton wasn't a Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:29 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. I left the party when the party made it clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:52 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. For someone who feels they were pushed out of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Not that many other people. Just Lieberman, and I don't even want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:09 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. Actually, the only people who get to decide this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. If YOU respect their judgment, why are you joining with those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:33 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Have you read any of my posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. So would you agree that killerbush was wrong to start this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 06:00 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. no more wrong than anyone who starts any thread that bashes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:21 PM Response to Reply #111 |
130. The issue isn't bashing. The issue is demands for withdrawal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #91 |
127. Notice it doesn't keep him from clogging a Democratic forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:25 PM Response to Reply #127 |
136. Deleted message |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:49 AM Response to Reply #136 |
148. Geeze, Ken, YOU announced you were leaving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #148 |
154. The fact that those Democrats that are attacked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. I suggest you go sob about it to somebody else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #157 |
166. Deleted message |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:30 PM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Go sob about it to somebody else, since it's no lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #166 |
169. Deleted message |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #157 |
174. When It comes to you, Benchley, I never sob, I laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:03 PM Response to Reply #87 |
99. Gore NEVER sounded "indistinguishable" from Dubya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:40 AM Response to Reply #74 |
122. This is such baloney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
70. Given that there is no credible or even vaguely electable GOP candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
76. If so, there's no reason for you to be demanding that he withdraw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
120. aye. so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
25. Very insightful analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. Anyone for a DU betting pool on this race? Money to go charity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'm glad he's running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
30. Deleted message |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. people in Ct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. how many more deaths are worth it for a war based on a lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
81. Blech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #33 |
150. So you're saying he was right to send us to war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatFelyne
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
175. Re: people in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
38. Ah investigation of mr Killerbush's site reveals his name there: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 08:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Sooo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Deleted message |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Or you and you gang can form a ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 05:05 AM Response to Reply #44 |
146. His "proclivities"? now c'mon, acmejack... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. The first step towards a cure is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. if it's an illness, I don't want a cure. But thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. Ah well, you'll have to hit rock bottom then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. well, winning usually is fun for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #64 |
140. Progressives believe in winning too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
129. So does most of the country.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
94. Yes I want a DLC majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:06 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. Actually, liberals have rarely been in a position to run the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:26 AM Response to Reply #94 |
121. you have a dlc majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
40. he may not win but THIS CT household has two votes for Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
93. Deleted message |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 06:00 AM Response to Reply #93 |
112. Project much? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 04:56 PM Response to Reply #93 |
156. Deleted message |
BillZBubb
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
56. Sure hope Lamont pulls it out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
65. I love the smell of fear coming from the Lieberman camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #65 |
78. Well said Larkspur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:52 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 05:10 AM Response to Reply #65 |
108. Man.. I just wish they'd REMEMBER what DLC did to Dean in '04. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:18 PM Response to Reply #108 |
128. DLC didn't DO anything to Dean.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 12:49 PM Response to Reply #128 |
151. Dean won his home state of Vermont 63% to 33%(Kerry) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. Vermont isn't a major primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. Not the point. Dean won his home state. Lieberman lost his home state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. That was exactly the point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #155 |
171. But the Rasmussan poll shows Lieberman with only a 11 pt lead on Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #152 |
159. Uh.... CT didn't give Lieberman the vote of confidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 05:43 PM Response to Reply #128 |
158. Wrong. Dean won VT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #65 |
138. I agree with your analysis, Larkspur! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
67. YES!! Kill the underdog before he causes a ruckus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
75. Not so fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
80. Looks like you'll be voting for LIEberman when he runs as an independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
95. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
102. Deleted message |
tkmorris
![]() |
Sun Mar-05-06 11:34 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Got a link for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
109. Sen. Lieberman is divorced from reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
114. I would still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #114 |
124. Deleted message |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:12 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. I don't care about bashing Lieberman. I care about having a foreign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #114 |
134. The intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
115. But when a republican congressman comes out for Joementum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
116. Joementum! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
123. So Connecticut goes for immoral cowards, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riona
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
126. we are talking about a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
131. WOW, I guess I'll have to donate some money to Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
132. Just join up to scold all of us democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InsultComicDog
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 03:22 AM Response to Reply #132 |
144. Lieberman is no Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum
![]() |
Mon Mar-06-06 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
133. Sorry, killerbush, the bottom line is: Joe Gotta Go. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
143. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
160. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
165. Deleted message |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
172. More REPUKES in your state support Lieberman than do Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Tue Mar-07-06 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
173. Normally I would agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
178. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC