|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
yurbud
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:12 PM Original message |
Poll question: Why aren't Democrats supporting Russ Feingold's censure of Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aden_nak
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. Cowardice, but of a different sort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. What aden_nak said!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. A lot of DC Dems support the basic agenda of the neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Other-why are you buying into the wedge issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Same here - Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. that would make sense if not for the glaring record of caving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
29. We're all IMPATIENT and GODDAMNED TIRED of all the shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
36. Wedge issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. Other - Feingold screwed up not lining up support first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Not Kerry, only Harkin and Boxer (according to Feingold) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 07:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Kerry's office says he supports it - not formally signed on as cosponsor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
37. There is also no contradiction here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. either would be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 09:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Unfortunately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. How hard is it to realize that Bush broke the law when he admitted it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 09:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. IndianaGreen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. So, is there anything the Democratic Party could do that you would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Is there anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. A partial list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. One thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thank you for answering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. With the folks running this year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 02:33 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Why is it so hard to use the word "LIAR"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigYawn
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
33. Let's face it...Finegold never wanted anything more than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Is that you Joementum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. I honestly don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think the real reason is that it's out of the normal process. There is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vox Populi
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. my first post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 05:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Actually, Feingold is getting what he needs - it's going to committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. we're just turning up the heat, so Dems know which way we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
41. blm....the Repugs shut down "the investigation." Without subpoena |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metta
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. They're afraid to see that Repubs are just a lot of storm and stress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. with some significant exceptions they aren't just silent but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metta
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. Yeah, that's wishful thinking and still based in fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Because they want to save the filibuster for a REALLY BAD nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. LMFAO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. They are complicit...whether it is cowardice or another reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChipsAhoy
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. VERY well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
28. Cowardice - they lack spines & are not sure what to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
32. !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:50 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. While the jellyfish has taken an admirable shape, we cannot support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
39. I couldn't vote......I think several of your choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I would agree with you on Murtha IF more Democrats had said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC