|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:47 AM Original message |
Poll question: Who will be the first woman to serve as a U.S. president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Where's Hillary? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gglor
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I doubt seriously if each of her donation listees is female and therefore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Your post makes no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:07 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. If you get a minute inbetween snipes, read my post #13. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Sometimes salt can be added, but even then, you get mixed results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
40. It's written in a secret code! No one is supposed to KNOW it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
59. I list only three favorite considerations I remember from my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. A close friend works for Senator Clinton's campaign in NY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. So why did you choose not to post her name? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. They just won't eat it, no matter how carefully it's prepared. They just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. They often overcharge at vets' places for this advice, so frankly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
57. In the summary of the original post I included this passage: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gglor
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:18 AM Original message |
thank you for the info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
31. No prob, gglor, and may the gods' and goddesses' peace be yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Again. In the post you will locate explanations for why every woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Why would you choose not to list Hillary? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. There are some animals that just won't eat a dish you prepare real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Some are that way, aren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Most aren't. You are exceedly rude this evening to me and others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Excuse me. Challenging posts respectfully is not rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:21 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. You might want to try reading the content of a post before you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 09:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
91. He can't answer yours or any other questions, so he comes from no where nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #91 |
117. na na na. Not allowed, mtnsnake. Such sneakiness! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. You might also want to do some research on female archetypes in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:23 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. To add just a thought or two here, Erika, you might be very interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
43. There's a prohibition against any candidate who used to belong to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
67. here ya go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
27. It may be a true loss that we no longer have Warren Christopher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
42. In the literal sense, she's probably in New York with Bill and other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
65. Had you read the original post summary and instructions, you would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magnolia
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
97. All the explanations as to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Thank you, magnolia. I would love to see Nancy Pelosi at the top of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Chelsea nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. It could happen. who knows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
33. I would definitely not count her out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoochpooch
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. The first female President will be someone who is very special |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Their supporters would disagree, their detractors would not, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoochpooch
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I'd love to see Pres. Boxer, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. have to agree, NeilSTL. What a great soul, though. I love her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vexatious Ape
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. I see the war mongering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
20. You don't strike me as the classic Sen. Clinton demographic, Vexatious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. So tell us about the demographics about Hillary n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:17 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. She, among other major Democrats, likes Thomas Jefferson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. The family of Thomas Jefferson fathered children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:25 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Well if only I had one more slot I'd put Sally in there just for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:29 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I do not know where you are coming from. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:34 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. You would if you wished to. Read my journal if you can tear yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
54. You can find out where people are coming from easily by reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
61. And there remains the difficult question of asking a male if he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #35 |
63. So if you were actually running Senator Clinton's presidential campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:03 AM Response to Reply #35 |
71. Can't speak for all here, but I respect & honor Dr. King's work and life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:52 AM Response to Reply #35 |
78. And as long as you've brought up the subject despite its being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
39. Senator Clinton -- that would be SENATOR Clinton -- will certainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vexatious Ape
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. I won't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Well, damn it, you're still invited to the picnic afterwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vexatious Ape
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Thanks old Crusoe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:40 AM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Oh hell -- killer BBQ? I'm there. I am goddam THERE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vexatious Ape
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:47 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Sammy goes down just great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:49 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Then Boston Lager it is. Hell, I'm flexible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daveskilt
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
44. Hey you are missing the most likely - Condileeza Rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. daveskilt, I completely agree. she is the most likely and I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:38 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Daveskilt, I just made it under the deadline and changed one slot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
47. Karenna Gore Schiff, 1 of Al Gore's talented and charismatic daughters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:39 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. She is an excellent choice. I love her. I think she must be a much-loved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Her positivity, good humor, enthusiastic nature, and intellect are awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:45 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. It's true. I see her connecting in a way her dad had to learn to perfect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:14 AM Response to Reply #52 |
60. if he made a hard run, I'd probably go for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #60 |
66. If you ask me, you're right on all counts. Also I appreciate the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:50 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I didn't know you were a Bradley delegate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:05 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Yes. A really cool-browed thinker, Bradley was not destined to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
56. Ann Coulter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Good lord, dweller. I hope not. That would be scarey. Way scarey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
62. Someone who didn't get their because her husband was President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:38 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Hi, Clarkie1. That would be a good thing for everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
68. my guess is that she hasnt been born yet or is a child/unknown now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:51 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. And that could be true. I am hopeful that it might be a living person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
111. My goodness. What a depressing thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:00 AM Response to Original message |
73. other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:22 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Recent polls indicate that a majority of American adults would in fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:56 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. polls might support the concept of a woman president.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:23 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. The poll by CBS speaks for itself and covers a much broader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:52 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:57 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. If it's not too low brow for ya, here's this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:49 AM Response to Reply #80 |
89. LOL not riled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #89 |
99. You've read the landscape beautifully. A pristine analysis of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:51 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:57 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. I'd have to take the multiple-thousand CBS poll data over that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:18 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Different Interpretation of Poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:20 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. No need to be sorry. You may be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:32 AM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Male Candidate wins over Female Candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:33 AM Response to Reply #86 |
87. No discounting your instinct. I read you loud and clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyblue
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:41 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Ok! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:17 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. yes Ferraro was a good test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:24 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. You'd have to agree that Congresswoman Ferraro was a gem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
90. Other: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #90 |
101. I hear you on Senator Boxer. She is a terrific soul. I hope she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
92. Nice try at belittling Clinton by omitting her. Real productive poll. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #92 |
102. Senator Clinton is a lawyer. If she feels morally outraged or lessened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #102 |
108. I read the summary. Funny how you "forgot" & then added Condi, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Such a coarse edge to your words on this fine morning in America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Not only do you sidestep each & every question asked of you, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. Delighted to see you rise to the defense of Senator Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:34 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Clark is my favorite but ploys like yours bring out the Hillary defense in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
93. Someone still cutting her teeth, perhaps at the local level ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #93 |
103. OK. That scenario seems plausible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddy Waters Guitar
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
94. I would hope Barbara Boxer-- she's better than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #94 |
104. Well, you get no argument from me on Senator Boxer. I would worry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
95. my daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #95 |
105. Well, excellent. She has my vote! That's the hope of having many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
96. Stupid Vote to Detract from 06 Elections: A Comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. O wiley you are so angry today. There's no "gratuitously hostile and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scordem
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
98. Why didn't you add our Hillary to the list??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:00 PM Response to Reply #98 |
106. I deliberately and mean-spiritedly left her out because I suspect that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
109. Other: Nancy Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. Has a real nice ring to it. Yep. I'm in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
116. Other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Well, I'm a male and I say it will happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Bless you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. I share your optimism, Totally Committed. Strongly. And I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begley
![]() |
Wed Apr-26-06 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
121. Where's Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Wed Apr-26-06 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
122. Ava. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Apr-26-06 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
123. Hillary would be a good choice....way better than Bush is doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Wed Apr-26-06 04:09 AM Response to Original message |
124. Barbara Streisand! Barbara Striesand! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC