|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
jackbourassa
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:04 AM Original message |
Possible Hillary scandal brewing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. I read so much in so many places, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NativeTexan
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
38. The low life repugs started early on Bill too! PI's are..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Oh, I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NativeTexan
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Agreed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackbourassa
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
71. Look guys i'm not endorsing this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jayhawk Lib
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
44. OH NO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
58. She killed the Easter Bunny too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:58 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. And Santa Claus, the Thanksgiving turkey, and all the eagles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. Fo those of us who don't want her as the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. How great for a DUer t o do that o a Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Let the truth out now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS ISN'T A HIT PIECE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Look I don't care if Karl Rove wrote it personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Kerry did fight back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Look, the Republicans ran the 2004 election cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #52 |
81. With control of both houses of Corngress, the Presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 06:49 AM Response to Reply #49 |
84. The media gave the Smear Boaters credibility, as you point out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. BUT WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO DISCUSS IT HERE???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Yes! DAMNIT, I AM SO SICK OF THIS!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
av8tor05
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #53 |
85. Oh please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. This smear has been out for quite a while, why repeat it now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
av8tor05
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:44 AM Response to Reply #91 |
94. I am not saying it should be discussed here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #36 |
48. They don't give a fuck. Worse than rethugs and freepers in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 08:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
99. Is Hillary a Dem? I'll have to keep reminding myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Don't worry. YOUR favored candidate will have their own bogus scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
30. "... they want her to be our candidate..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:06 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Why do you & so many others let the Right Wing push you around? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
56. obviously it would be best for all concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. You are a credit to DU and Liberals everywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackbourassa
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
72. DainBramaged, you hate this thread so much that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #18 |
95. Speak DainBramaged! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. If you can't beat her any other way, a scandal is fine by you. Great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. I have to agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Knowing that you hate Hillary, I decided to ignore you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
42. Scandals on all of the Dem candidates would be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
46. I would vote for her if she was the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
100. I don't want Hillary as the nominee, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rooboy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. At least she'd be reaching out to republicans if it were true... :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
4. Oh, NOOOOOO!!! The GOP will be friken DEVASTATED!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Now that would be nice!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedeminredstate
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. That puts a smile on my face! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
57. THAT would be fun to watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
5. month old article by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WePurrsevere
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
34. Good catch.Thank you for pointing out that the writer is a RW hack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
7. This illustrates my concern that Hillary is open to attack by her enemies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. She and Bill have enemies here, so sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Your "concern"? The RW might have you running for shelter, but not her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
90. Yes..and Kerry's lack of the same attacks in his past... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
8. The main reason I will NOT vote for Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. So then it's ok with you for Republicans to maintain power? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
64. oh please don't tell me that hillary is the best we have to offer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. Deleted sub-thread |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
24. So enabling the Republican to win is better? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
50. Let's assume she runs and wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. and if that is what happens, even though I would not have voted for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
65. maybe we should nominate a candidate that stands for FDR values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
9. There is absolutely NO basis for the deduction Hillary dealt with Pelicano |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. This is just another Hillary bashing thread , plain and simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
norml
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
10. Some scandal, hiring a detective back in the 90s to find dirt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. And to find dirt about people Scaife was paying to slander Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
15. If would be convenient for Republicans to find a HC scandal about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
17. More innuendo, w/o facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
60. I gotta laugh everytime I hear some of these lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
21. What is your purpose in posting this Jack, stiring up shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackbourassa
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
74. DainBramaged, I was putting it out there.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Do not play FAUX News games with me here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackbourassa
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #76 |
86. I forgot you were the judge of what can or can not be posted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:01 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Aren't you from Canada? And did you read just who Lipscomb is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddy Waters Guitar
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
26. This is one of the many unsavory things IMHO about the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Why does attacking Bill help us in November? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #26 |
89. There's nothing legitimate to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
29. The SBVT would surely appreciate you sending them a copy of this article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
31. She has NOT announced her candidacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:47 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. HEAR HEAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
33. It's unlikely that EVERYTHING he did was against the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
40. Using a private detective to undermine paid accusers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:14 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. In fact, it was a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
51. Why is a Democratic board printing innuendo and rumours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Because some people here aren't Democrats, period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. Better we deal with it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Deal with what? Threads simply to torment us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
63. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
75. Deleted sub-thread |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
67. Oh no, we are not going to talk about Bill's sex life again...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. There are some in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:24 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Yep, a lot of Dems fell for the Repug character assassination of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
68. Democrats fighting slander, the horror!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
69. I hope there is no scandal. Sen. Clinton should be considered in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
73. So what? Whoever does get the Dem nomination, there will always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
77. Hiring private detectives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sun Apr-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
80. I'm no Hillary fan.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
82. Thomas Lipscomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 02:45 AM Response to Original message |
83. The RW has shot their wad on the Clintons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Especially from folks who don't even reside here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #83 |
92. Right on the button... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
93. The voters could care less about decade old sex scandals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
96. This is Not Dirt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFleur1
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 10:47 AM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Either /Or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thatsrightimirish
![]() |
Mon Apr-17-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
98. Who cares |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC