|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:31 AM Original message |
A Lieberman win means ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. Oh I dislike him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. The move is to the right wing of the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. The European sense of 'left' is far more 'left' than our sense of 'left' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. that the pendulum (stuck on insanity) is heading back to sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
72. A bloodless coup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. If Democrats want to restore and maintain their identity, they need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If the people of Connecticut ultimately elect Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. If, on the other hand, they want to win elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
70. The phrase "purge collaborators and traitors" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. I am suspicious of this post. why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. So the new litmus test is pure semantics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
50. No. It means that we shouldn't stoop to the right-wing's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #50 |
100. You're paranoid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I support the grass roots and the peoples party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Then why do you use the denigrating phrase... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Oh, I thought it was the proper term for the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. It's the DEMOCRATIC party, and always has been. For everyone here who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:13 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Gotcha! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 06:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
81. It would be difficult to read your post and suspect your motives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
91. You claim you are a Democrat, but don't know the proper name of the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
90. It's a matter of "tense" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
46. Right. It would be like calling them the Republi Party. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
53. GET REAL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Win or Lose, it's still a wake-up call to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. I think a win for Lamont is needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. My thoughts exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
39. No, its not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
83. I think you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
10. I dislike his disingenuous, colluding, DINO A** for both of us.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
54. Believe me.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fuzzyball
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
11. It means Ned Lamont peaked too soon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
12. a win for Joementum means the grassroots has no power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. THAT IS the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Last minute tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. What is the latest poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. That still seems to be holding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:07 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. You never know - some of those Indies might WANT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:17 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Here's hoping!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Lamont has done amazingly, incredibly well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. but the Grassroots has to finally break throught with a win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I t hought the Grassroots... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I live in the Cegalis/Duckworth district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Not high profile enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmedem
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
52. No! Don't give up! Even if Lieberman squeaks by in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. It means Connecticut Democrats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Means that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Means that mature Democrats...like Ned Lamont... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. If LIEberman loses, then MATURE Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Exactly right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Are you suggesting that those who do not support Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Read the post I was responding too.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. Oh, I disagree, There is a lot more at stake. It determines the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
22. If Lieberman wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. It wouldn't mean that Lamont was a bad candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. it means almost certain losses for the Dems in the years to come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Yes, and the MSM is working HARD... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
33. If he wins, which is still the more likely scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrueFunkSoldier
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Very well put... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Great post. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
37. Martin Peretz and AIPAC commit suicide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'm sure the talking heads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
45. A Lieberman win means election fraud, plain and simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
60. And how did you arrive at that conclusion???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. because as of today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:23 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. That I am, but WE DON"T USE DIEBOLD IN CT !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:33 PM Response to Reply #64 |
75. Congratulations, to-be grammy!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
94. Thank you, yes it is is shaping up to be a very good day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #45 |
77. Thar's what I was thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstans
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
47. I disagree...look at the big picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I hope it will be seen that way by those who matter in the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstans
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
85. The parties insiders want to keep the status quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_TN_TITANS
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
48. 30 years is long enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:06 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. I know I'm ready for something other than a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
56. A Lieberman win means Diebold has gone bipartisan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Not so............... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:25 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Than obviously Lieberman will lose. Enough said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:29 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. OK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Me too: hope for the best, prepare for the worst. We'll know in 28 hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #61 |
89. The Lever machines have been rigged forever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
67. A Lieberman win means they STOLE it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:34 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. Not likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:51 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. well, hooray for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Nope. Not yet anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Take my advice, keep them out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
69. It means being anti-war is an electoral loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 04:51 AM Response to Reply #69 |
96. You mean the red states where majorities oppose the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. I mean what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
71. What a pantload.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. Why does being anti-war = "The far left" to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 06:58 AM Response to Reply #84 |
98. Why does the porridge bird lay its eggs in the air? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #84 |
101. And so is MrBenchley - it gets boring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #71 |
88. Far left? Explain what you mean by "far left". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:32 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. It's his favorite phrase for anybody that doesn't support repuke-lite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 06:57 AM Response to Reply #88 |
97. This "I have no idea what you mean" gambit has gotten tired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
73. If Lieberman wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
74. We're doomed!! Doomed I tells ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
82. REMEMBER, THE PRIMARY IS TOMORROW, TUESDAY the 8TH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
86. ......Diebold takes bribes from "some" democrats n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LowerManhattanite
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Hold on here...are you trying to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Mon Aug-07-06 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
92. It means the corporations win, the DINOs relax & change grinds to a halt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley
![]() |
Tue Aug-08-06 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
95. A Lieberman win would be similar to the Taliban win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC