http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/4528386.htmlGOP motives are suspect on Senate antisurge votes
By E.J. DIONNE JR.
When political opponents tell you that to prove your seriousness you need to pursue a strategy they know is doomed to failure, shouldn't you be skeptical of their advice?
As the Senate considers a resolution to put itself on record opposing President Bush's escalation of the Iraq War through a "surge" of troops, Bush's backers are saying one thing and doing another.
They are saying that the resolution is meaningless and that true opponents of the war should prove their sincerity by cutting off funding altogether. But they are doing all they can to keep the Senate from even voting on a bipartisan antisurge resolution that would send a powerful message to Bush that most Americans have lost faith in his bungled war policy.
snip//
Supporters of Bush's war policy would love a vote on a full funding cutoff right now because they know that, at this moment, they could win it. They would love responsibility for the failures in Iraq to fall not on an administration that planned its policy so badly and carried it out so incompetently. Far better for them to heap blame on the war's opponents for "losing faith."
And they know, as the war's opponents should, that in a democracy whose Constitution accords so much power to the president, turning around even a failed war policy takes time, persuasion, organizing, legislative strategizing and pressure.
The impatience of the administration's critics is entirely understandable. But it would be a shame if impatience got in the way of a sensible long-term strategy to bring America's engagement in this war to as decent an end as quickly as possible — even if not as quickly as they'd like. The antisurge resolution is a necessary first step. Which is why those who are against a genuine change in our Iraq policy are fighting so hard to stop it.
Dionne is a columnist for the Washington Post (postchat@aol.com)