|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:22 AM Original message |
Poll: Hillary "standing by her man" boosts her in latest poll. So there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. Could you Hillary boosters get any more defensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I have yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I have yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. why do you consider this defensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Take out the "so there" part and your post sounds fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. why not rub it into the rightwing? You have an issue with that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No issue with that if that was your intention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. does the anti-Hillary crowd believe her saving her marriage is weakness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I don't get this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. perhaps you've misunderstood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. The nub of the problem seems to be anyone who thinks they are the "real" anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Sorry, but as always.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 07:35 AM Response to Reply #30 |
70. While true, DU is an obscure DB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 08:41 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. yes, true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. There's truthiness all around us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 09:37 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. yes there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
102. Wow what an assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. oh, I forgot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. Right and if you followed the conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. I did follow the conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. To me it looks like Bill and Hillary have a pretty good arrangement. She |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
6. oh great. more bad news this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. ...so who should? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. we have a pretty strong field of honest folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I could (and quite easily) rip everyone you've listed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. see what you did? you scared him off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. you didn't address my post. Which candidate should we rip on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 09:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I'll just stick to ripping on Hillary. So many issues and juicy targets w/ her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. the same with your list. Some even more so. Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Rip on all of them...go ahead...let's see your assessment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. nope! One at a time. Make your choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. Well, Edwards is a Triangulator, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
8. Interesting news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
10. How will this poll if she is the nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. the future is a mystery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. you forgot "Little grasshopper" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
14. Great! Now I'll vote in the primaries for her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingofNewOrleans
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
19. I think she should go with the Tammy Wynette hairdo too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
98. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
22. Are you suggesting we give up and Douse Hillary with the "waters" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. Is Tammy Wynnette going to sing Team Hillary's campaign song? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Yep, it's none of my business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Hillary stood by Bill as a patriot as well as a wife. In doing so, she helped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Bill, more than the president, was and is her husband |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. MoveOn did more to prevent a rightwing coup than Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Hillary put aside her personal feelings and "soldiered on" as a duty to country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Was it duty to country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Polls indicate that most Dems give Hill the benefit of the doubt in matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Well that explains it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. This is not England, and the Clintons are not the Windsors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. 'Soldiering On' pg. 439 of "Living History" by Hillary Rodham Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
80. She saved the country, is what she did.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. I'll give her credit for being mentally tough through it all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
35. That was superfluous, unneeded, and insulting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. insulting to who? If it isn't an issue here, why even respond? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. How about your cocky and pompous attitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 05:52 AM Response to Reply #40 |
68. Hit the alert and/or ignore feature... or maybe you think you can change my attitude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #68 |
92. How about no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #92 |
95. so you argue with yourself alot, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Her greatest disadvantage in the race is that she is the frontrunner now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm actually suprised... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freeplessinseattle
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
83. I thought so too, but then women tend to like Hillary more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
43. What a fucking loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Holy balls, you really put it out there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. you mean if you could verify it...cause chaces are....well you know. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #52 |
82. hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
45. The Clintons' personal life is none of our damn business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. It is too much too ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. this isn't Jerry Springer, dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. I could care less who fucks who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. and your rhetoric about her is just mean-spirited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 07:39 AM Response to Reply #58 |
71. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 07:53 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. it's not naivete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #73 |
78. I totally understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. somebody's had personal experience and is...bitter? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 07:41 AM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Actually not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit
![]() |
Mon Feb-26-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #50 |
113. If he didn't want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. in your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. I'm not a "non-judgment" person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. "I take no joy in knowing others are in pain." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. my alter-ego |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. With the mouse out of Atomic Kitten's avatar, I thought it was a cat w/tail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Feb-20-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. I thought of it as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #55 |
108. And if the alternative was a right-wing Republican who could destroy the country and the world? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
69. And this news(old news at that) is relevant how, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
74. Funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Would you have "cheats" publically flogged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. Two strawmans for the price of one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. how are they strawmen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. I thought you might like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. No, he doesn't mention flogging or mandatory sentencing. He DOES, however... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 07:53 AM Response to Reply #76 |
94. No. I would not have them "publicly flogged." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. then you share a trait with Rush Limbaugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #97 |
105. afterall, all we heard from the rightwing as Clinton saved the country was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. It does matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Deleted message |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
84. How could anyone polled... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. We know who and what Hillary represents.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #84 |
93. bad experience with the ladies? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
87. Clearly, this changes everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Wed Feb-21-07 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
91. Why is this so surprising? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
99. And we should care, because.....??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. That's not a good enough reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. *sarcasm noted* :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
101. Hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Sun Feb-25-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. I find her marriage as phony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit
![]() |
Mon Feb-26-07 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
114. I can't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit
![]() |
Mon Feb-26-07 01:32 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Lastly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC