|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 07:54 AM Original message |
To borrow a theme from LoZoccolo: Why do some think it is flamebait to post anti-Nader threads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. He irritates me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. Gee, that's a challenging question. Here are some similarly tough ones: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Because most of them are. The debate over Nader causing Gore to lose is flame bait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Wonder how those Nader voters in New Hampshire feel now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Excuse me .... but ...... uh ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Bingo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
4. Most of us understand the role Nader plays for the Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. reasonable discourse on his actions is not flamebait. a post of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Why is it flamebait? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. as long as some people do not think they can have it both ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Funny thing about the (may I remind everyone?) **never elected* Nader .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
8. There are a lot of former Greens here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. it's actually both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. That's my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. well, I wouldn't bother asking *them*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Thanks for the recommendations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Speaking for me alone ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You might want to avoid those words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. I suppose, whether anyone wants to alienate the greens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Will it help get Democrats elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. If it stops anyone from recruiting potential voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I think it's appropriate that people be shamed for threatening brash destructive actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. how's that shaming angle working out for ya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Beautifully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. you forgot the wild, cackling laugh of triumph. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. It's a pretty weird tactic to resort to in an anonymous venue. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. excellent point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Actually, I'd say the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. So you're saying that DU has influence over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. No, but it has influence over DUers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Good points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Nader's thinking of running in 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Studying the past is not the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Except that no one is ashamed when you do it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TSIAS
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. The shaming isn't working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
9. "Why do some think it is flamebait to post anti-Nader threads?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
13. Why don't you go and get a job with Lieberman? I hear he's hiring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Care to elaborate on that? Or will that be just another "prooogresssiivve" hit and run post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Deleted message |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. "you're here. You're watching me." Oooooh! Now I'm scared! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. No credibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't think it's flamebait, in fact I find it funny in a sad, pathetic kind of way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. I see lots of things that I think are causing the demise of the Democratic party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. Well, because for one thing, Nader's completely irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive Friend
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
32. Bashing Nader encourages sectarianism on the Left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. It's not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TSIAS
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. Most people here anti-Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
42. Wyldwolf, you already know the answer to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
49. Every time Foghorn Leghorn beats the sleeping dog with the board... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I think that you may be watching the same cartoon, just over and over again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. possibly. I know *I* am. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC